Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validating the danger of vehicular protective devices and bowel injury.
Abid, Mustafa; Schneider, Andrew; Raff, Lauren; Charles, Anthony; Gallaher, Jared R.
Afiliação
  • Abid M; Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Schneider A; Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Raff L; Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Charles A; Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Gallaher JR; Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: jared_gallaher@med.unc.edu.
Injury ; 53(9): 3047-3051, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35613968
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Protective devices such as seat belts and airbags have improved the safety of motor vehicle occupants, but limited data suggest they may be associated with increased blunt bowel (small bowel or colon) injuries (BI). Unfortunately, this risk is unquantified.

METHODS:

We analyzed the National Trauma Data Bank (2017-2019) using ICD-10 codes to identify adult motor vehicle occupants with BI who underwent surgical repair. We used logistic regression modeling to compare the risk of undergoing surgical repair for BI after using a protective device.

RESULTS:

Of 2,848,592 injured patients, 475,546 (16.7%) were motor vehicle occupants. Only 1.2% (n = 5627/475,546) of patients underwent a bowel repair or resection. Using a seat belt only was associated with an adjusted OR of 2.09 (95% CI 1.91, 2.28) for undergoing a bowel repair/resection when adjusting for Injury Severity Score (ISS) and age. Airbag deployment without a seat belt had an adjusted OR of 1.46 (95% CI 1.31, 1.62), while both devices combined conferred an OR of 3.27 (95% CI 3.02, 3.54). However, using a seat belt was protective against death with an OR of 0.50 (95% CI 0.48, 0.53), adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Score, and ISS.

CONCLUSION:

Seat belts and airbags are essential public health safety interventions and protect against death in motor vehicle-associated injuries. However, patients involved in MVCs with airbag deployment or while wearing a seat belt are at an increased risk of bowel injury requiring surgery compared to unrestrained patients, despite these events being relatively uncommon.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Air Bags / Traumatismos Abdominais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Air Bags / Traumatismos Abdominais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article