Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Underlying Cardiovascular Mechanisms of Resuscitation and Injury of REBOA and Partial REBOA.
Stonko, David P; Edwards, Joseph; Abdou, Hossam; Elansary, Noha N; Lang, Eric; Savidge, Samuel G; Hicks, Caitlin W; Morrison, Jonathan J.
Afiliação
  • Stonko DP; R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Edwards J; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Abdou H; R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Elansary NN; R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Lang E; R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Savidge SG; R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Hicks CW; R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Morrison JJ; Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Front Physiol ; 13: 871073, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35615678
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is used for aortic control in hemorrhagic shock despite little quantification of its mechanism of resuscitation or cardiac injury. The goal of this study was to use pressure-volume (PV) loop analysis and direct coronary blood flow measurements to describe the physiologic changes associated with the clinical use of REBOA.

Methods:

Swine underwent surgical and vascular access to measure left ventricular PV loops and left coronary flow in hemorrhagic shock and subsequent placement of occlusive REBOA, partial REBOA, and no REBOA. PV loop characteristics and coronary flow are compared graphically with PV loops and coronary waveforms, and quantitatively with measures of the end systolic and end pressure volume relationship, and coronary flow parameters, with accounting for multiple comparisons.

Results:

Hemorrhagic shock was induced in five male swine (mean 53.6 ± 3.6 kg) as demonstrated by reduction of stroke work (baseline 3.1 vs. shock 1.2 L*mmHg, p < 0.01) and end systolic pressure (ESP; 109.8 vs. 59.6 mmHg, p < 0.01). ESP increased with full REBOA (178.4 mmHg; p < 0.01), but only moderately with partial REBOA (103.0 mmHg, p < 0.01 compared to shock). End systolic elastance was augmented from baseline to shock (1.01 vs. 0.39 ml/mmHg, p < 0.01) as well as shock compared to REBOA (4.50 ml/mmHg, p < 0.01) and partial REBOA (3.22 ml/mmHg, p = 0.01). Percent time in antegrade coronary flow decreased in shock (94%-71.8%, p < 0.01) but was rescued with REBOA. Peak flow increased with REBOA (271 vs. shock 93 ml/min, p < 0.01) as did total flow (peak 2136, baseline 424 ml/min, p < 0.01). REBOA did not augment the end diastolic pressure volume relationship.

Conclusion:

REBOA increases afterload to facilitate resuscitation, but the penalty is supraphysiologic coronary flows and imposed increase in LV contractility to maintain cardiac output. Partial REBOA balances the increased afterload with improved aortic system compliance to prevent injury.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article