Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Age on Multimodality Treatment and Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients.
De Nes, Lindsey C F; Heil, Thea C; Verhoeven, Rob H A; Lemmens, Valery E P P; Rutten, Harm J; De Wilt, Johannes H W; Vissers, Pauline A J.
Afiliação
  • De Nes LCF; Department of Surgery, Maasziekenhuis Pantein, 5831 HA Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
  • Heil TC; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Verhoeven RHA; Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Lemmens VEPP; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Rutten HJ; Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • De Wilt JHW; Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Vissers PAJ; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(11)2022 May 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35681721
ABSTRACT

Background:

Optimal treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation followed by radical surgery. This is challenging in the aging population because of frequently concomitant comorbidity. We analyzed whether age below and above 70 years is associated with differences in treatment strategy and outcome in this population-based study.

Methods:

Data between 2008 and 2016 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until 2021. Differences in therapy, referral and outcome were analyzed using χ2 tests, multivariable logistic regression and relative survival analysis.

Results:

In total, 6524 locally advanced rectal cancer patients were included. A greater proportion of patients <70 years underwent resection compared to older patients (89% vs. 71%). Patients ≥70 years were more likely treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.61−4.52), than with chemoradiation (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.23−0.37) and less often referred to higher volume hospitals for resection (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.51−0.87). Five-year relative survival after resection following neoadjuvant therapy was comparable and higher for both patients <70 years and ≥70 years (82% and 77%) than after resection only. Resection only was associated with worse survival in the elderly compared to younger patients (56% vs. 75%).

Conclusion:

Elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received less intensive treatment and were less often referred to higher volume hospitals for surgery. Relative survival was good and comparable after optimal treatment in both age groups. Effort is necessary to improve guideline adherence, and multimodal strategies should be tailored to age, comorbidity and performance status.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article