Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark-resight models with camera trap data.
Bengsen, Andrew J; Forsyth, David M; Ramsey, Dave S L; Amos, Matt; Brennan, Michael; Pople, Anthony R; Comte, Sebastien; Crittle, Troy.
Afiliação
  • Bengsen AJ; NSW Department of Primary Industries, Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, 1447 Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
  • Forsyth DM; NSW Department of Primary Industries, Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, 1447 Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
  • Ramsey DSL; Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia.
  • Amos M; Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia.
  • Brennan M; Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia.
  • Pople AR; Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia.
  • Comte S; NSW Department of Primary Industries, Vertebrate Pest Research Unit, 1447 Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
  • Crittle T; NSW Department of Primary Industries, Biosecurity and Food Safety, 4 Marsden Park Road, Calala, NSW 2340, Australia.
J Mammal ; 103(3): 711-722, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35707678
ABSTRACT
Globally, many wild deer populations are actively studied or managed for conservation, hunting, or damage mitigation purposes. These studies require reliable estimates of population state parameters, such as density or abundance, with a level of precision that is fit for purpose. Such estimates can be difficult to attain for many populations that occur in situations that are poorly suited to common survey methods. We evaluated the utility of combining camera trap survey data, in which a small proportion of the sample is individually recognizable using natural markings, with spatial mark-resight (SMR) models to estimate deer density in a variety of situations. We surveyed 13 deer populations comprising four deer species (Cervus unicolor, C. timorensis, C. elaphus, Dama dama) at nine widely separated sites, and used Bayesian SMR models to estimate population densities and abundances. Twelve surveys provided sufficient data for analysis and seven produced density estimates with coefficients of variation (CVs) ≤ 0.25. Estimated densities ranged from 0.3 to 24.6 deer km-2. Camera trap surveys and SMR models provided a powerful and flexible approach for estimating deer densities in populations in which many detections were not individually identifiable, and they should provide useful density estimates under a wide range of conditions that are not amenable to more widely used methods. In the absence of specific local information on deer detectability and movement patterns, we recommend that at least 30 cameras be spaced at 500-1,000 m and set for 90 days. This approach could also be applied to large mammals other than deer.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article