Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: Current status and future needs for predicting heart, kidney and lung toxicities.
Bassan, Arianna; Alves, Vinicius M; Amberg, Alexander; Anger, Lennart T; Beilke, Lisa; Bender, Andreas; Bernal, Autumn; Cronin, Mark T D; Hsieh, Jui-Hua; Johnson, Candice; Kemper, Raymond; Mumtaz, Moiz; Neilson, Louise; Pavan, Manuela; Pointon, Amy; Pletz, Julia; Ruiz, Patricia; Russo, Daniel P; Sabnis, Yogesh; Sandhu, Reena; Schaefer, Markus; Stavitskaya, Lidiya; Szabo, David T; Valentin, Jean-Pierre; Woolley, David; Zwickl, Craig; Myatt, Glenn J.
Afiliação
  • Bassan A; Innovatune srl, Via Giulio Zanon 130/D, 35129 Padova, Italy.
  • Alves VM; The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of the National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.
  • Amberg A; Sanofi, R&D Preclinical Safety Frankfurt, Industriepark Hoechst, D-65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Anger LT; Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, United States.
  • Beilke L; Toxicology Solutions Inc., San Diego, CA, United States.
  • Bender A; AI and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Bernal A; Centre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United States.
  • Cronin MTD; ToxCreative, LLC, Laguna Hills, CA, United States.
  • Hsieh JH; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
  • Johnson C; The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Division of the National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.
  • Kemper R; Instem, 1393 Dublin Road, Columbus, OH 43215, United States.
  • Mumtaz M; Nuvalent, One Broadway, 14th floor, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.
  • Neilson L; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Pavan M; Broughton Nicotine Services, Oak Tree House, West Craven Drive, Earby, Lancashire BB18 6JZ UK.
  • Pointon A; Innovatune srl, Via Giulio Zanon 130/D, 35129 Padova, Italy.
  • Pletz J; Functional and Mechanistic Safety, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ruiz P; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
  • Russo DP; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, United States.
  • Sabnis Y; The Rutgers Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Camden, NJ 08102, United States.
  • Sandhu R; Department of Chemistry, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ 08102, United States.
  • Schaefer M; UCB Biopharma SRL, Chemin du Foriest, B-1420 Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
  • Stavitskaya L; SafeDose Ltd., 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 921, Toronto, Ontario M5G2H1, Canada.
  • Szabo DT; Sanofi, R&D Preclinical Safety Frankfurt, Industriepark Hoechst, D-65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Valentin JP; US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
  • Woolley D; PPG Industries, Pittsburgh, PA 15146, United States.
  • Zwickl C; UCB Biopharma SRL, Chemin du Foriest, B-1420 Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
  • Myatt GJ; ForthTox Limited, PO Box 13550, Linlithgow, EH49 7YU, UK.
Comput Toxicol ; 202021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35721273
ABSTRACT
The kidneys, heart and lungs are vital organ systems evaluated as part of acute or chronic toxicity assessments. New methodologies are being developed to predict these adverse effects based on in vitro and in silico approaches. This paper reviews the current state of the art in predicting these organ toxicities. It outlines the biological basis, processes and endpoints for kidney toxicity, pulmonary toxicity, respiratory irritation and sensitization as well as functional and structural cardiac toxicities. The review also covers current experimental approaches, including off-target panels from secondary pharmacology batteries. Current in silico approaches for prediction of these effects and mechanisms are described as well as obstacles to the use of in silico methods. Ultimately, a commonly accepted protocol for performing such assessment would be a valuable resource to expand the use of such approaches across different regulatory and industrial applications. However, a number of factors impede their widespread deployment including a lack of a comprehensive mechanistic understanding, limited in vitro testing approaches and limited in vivo databases suitable for modeling, a limited understanding of how to incorporate absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) considerations into the overall process, a lack of in silico models designed to predict a safe dose and an accepted framework for organizing the key characteristics of these organ toxicants.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article