Comparison of detection limits of direct-counting CMOS and CCD cameras in EELS experiments.
Ultramicroscopy
; 240: 113577, 2022 Oct.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35728341
ABSTRACT
The noise performance and the detection limits of a direct-counting complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) K2 camera and a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera in electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) experiments were evaluated. In the case of a single spectrum acquired at the shortest dwell times (2.5 ms for K2 and 1 µs for CCD), the detection limit, defined as three times the standard deviation of the spectral noise (3σ), was very low (1 e-/channel) in the counting-mode spectrum acquired with the K2 camera compared with that acquired with the CCD camera (5 e-/channel). By contrast, the spectral noise of the K2 camera changed depending on the dwell time because of the multiple read-outs related to its fixed frame rate (400 fps). The spectral noise of the K2 camera was greater than that of the CCD camera when the dwell time was longer than â¼30 ms. Thus, the CCD camera was found to still be useful when detecting a very small number of electrons using a long acquisition time. In the case of an accumulated spectrum obtained by acquiring 10,000 spectra after subtracting the ultra-high-quality dark reference signal, the detection limits per read-out were â¼0.016 and â¼0.025 e-/channel/read-out for the K2 and CCD cameras, respectively. Because both cameras have advantages and disadvantages with respect to their detection limit, speed, and dynamic range, their proper use is important.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article