Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research Note: Choice of microbiota database affects data analysis and interpretation in chicken cecal microbiota.
Campos, Philip M; Darwish, Nadia; Shao, Jonathan; Proszkowiec-Weglarz, Monika.
Afiliação
  • Campos PM; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) USDA-ARS Research Participation Program, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; USDA-ARS, NEA Bioinformatics, Statistics Group, Beltsville, MD, USA; USDA-ARS, NEA, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville,
  • Darwish N; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) USDA-ARS Research Participation Program, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; USDA-ARS, NEA Bioinformatics, Statistics Group, Beltsville, MD, USA; USDA-ARS, NEA, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville,
  • Shao J; USDA-ARS, NEA Bioinformatics, Statistics Group, Beltsville, MD, USA.
  • Proszkowiec-Weglarz M; USDA-ARS, NEA, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. Electronic address: monika.weglarz@usda.gov.
Poult Sci ; 101(8): 101971, 2022 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35759996
ABSTRACT
The chicken microbiota is often analyzed to address questions about the effects of diet or disease on poultry health. To analyze the microbiota, bioinformatic platforms such as QIIME 2 and mothur are used, which incorporate public taxonomic databases such as Greengenes, the ribosomal database project (RDP), and SILVA to assign taxonomies to bacterial sequences. Many chicken microbiota studies continue to incorporate the Greengenes database, which has not been updated since 2013. To determine whether a choice of database could affect results, this study compared the results of bioinformatic analyses obtained using the Greengenes, RDP, and SILVA databases on a cecal luminal microbiome dataset. The QIIME 2 platform was used to process 16S bacterial sequences and assign taxonomies with Greengenes, RDP, and SILVA. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was performed, allowing for the comparison of taxonomies considered significantly differentially abundant between the three databases. Some notable differences between databases were observed in results, in particular the ability of SILVA database to classify members of the family Lachnospiraceae into separate genera, while these members remained in one group of unclassified Lachnospiraceae through Greengenes and RDP. LEfSe analyses showed that the SILVA database produced more differentially abundant genera, in large part due to the classification of these separate Lachnospiraceae genera. Additionally, the relative abundance of unclassified Lachnospiraceae in SILVA results was significantly lower than in RDP results. Our results show the choice of taxonomic database can influence the results of a microbiota study at the genus level, potentially affecting the interpretation of the results. The use of the SILVA database is recommended over Greengenes in chicken microbiota studies, as more specific classifications at the genus level may provide more accurate interpretations of changes in the microbiota.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Galinhas / Microbiota Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Galinhas / Microbiota Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article