Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sorption, degradation and microbial toxicity of chemicals associated with hydraulic fracturing fluid and produced water in soils.
Kookana, Rai S; Williams, Mike; Gregg, Adrienne; Semmler, Adelle; Du, Jun; Apte, Simon C.
Afiliação
  • Kookana RS; CSIRO Land and Water, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia; University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. Electronic address: Rai.Kookana@csiro.au.
  • Williams M; CSIRO Land and Water, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. Electronic address: Mike.Williams@csiro.au.
  • Gregg A; CSIRO Land and Water, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. Electronic address: Adrienne.Gregg@csiro.au.
  • Semmler A; CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. Electronic address: Adelle.Semmler@csiro.au.
  • Du J; CSIRO Land and Water, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia. Electronic address: Jun.Du@csiro.au.
  • Apte SC; CSIRO Land and Water, Locked Bag 2007, Kirrawee, NSW, 2232, Australia. Electronic address: Simon.Apte@csiro.au.
Environ Pollut ; 309: 119754, 2022 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35835270
ABSTRACT
Spills of hydraulic fracturing (HF) fluids and of produced water during unconventional gas extraction operations may cause soil contamination. We studied the degradation and microbial toxicity of selected HF chemical components including two biocides (methylisothiozolinone- MIT, chloromethylisothiozolinone- CMIT), a gel-breaker aid (triethanolamine -TEA), and three geogenic chemicals (phenol, m-cresol and p-cresol) in ultrapure water, HF fluid and produced water in five different soil types (surface and subsurface soils). The degradation of the two biocides (in soils treated with HF fluid or ultrapure water) and of the three geogenic chemicals (in soils treated with produced water) was rapid (in all cases DT50 values < 2 days in surface soils). In contrast, the loss of TEA was much slower in soils, especially in those treated with HF fluid (DT50 > 30 days). Sorption coefficients (Koc in L/Kg) in these soils ranged from 71 to 733 for TEA, 64-408 for MIT and 11-72 for CMIT. In terms of soil microbial toxicity, exposure to HF fluid and produced water reduced microbial respiration, albeit temporarily. The overall microbial activities in surface soils contaminated with produced water had fully recovered in most soils. In contrast, the HF fluid addition to soils completely inhibited the nitrification in all soils, with little recovery over the 60 day experimental period. In the case of produced water exposure, three out of five surface soils showed complete recovery in nitrification during the study period. The functional genes for nitrogen fixation (nifH) and carbon cycling (GA1) and microbial community composition (16 S rRNA) were significantly affected by HF fluid in some soils. Overall, the study shows that the HF fluid can have significant detrimental impact on soil microbial functions, especially on nitrogen cycling. More work is needed to identify the exact cause of microbial toxicity in soils contaminated with HF fluid.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desinfetantes / Fraturamento Hidráulico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desinfetantes / Fraturamento Hidráulico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article