Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of Laser Lithotripsy for Midsize Stones Using Robotic Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery System easyUretero in a Porcine Model.
Han, Hyunho; Kim, Joonhwan; Moon, Young Joon; Jung, Hae Do; Cheon, Byungsik; Han, Jungmin; Cho, Sung Yong; Kwon, Dong-Soo; Lee, Joo Yong.
Afiliação
  • Han H; Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim J; ROEN Surgical, Inc., Daejeon, Korea.
  • Moon YJ; Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Jung HD; Department of Urology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
  • Cheon B; ROEN Surgical, Inc., Daejeon, Korea.
  • Han J; Robotics Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea.
  • Cho SY; ROEN Surgical, Inc., Daejeon, Korea.
  • Kwon DS; Robotics Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea.
  • Lee JY; Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Endourol ; 36(12): 1586-1592, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35850514
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To test the safety and feasibility of laser lithotripsy for midsize renal stones using a newly developed robotic retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) system (easyUretero) in a porcine model. Materials and

Methods:

Three urologic surgeons representing three different RIRS experience levels (beginner, intermediate, and expert) participated. Four female pigs (aged 6 months) underwent manual or robotic RIRS. Under general anesthesia, a nephrostomy tract was created ventrally, and calcium stones (diameter, 1.0-1.5 cm) were inserted at renal calices. For manual RIRS, surgeons operated a flexible ureteroscope. For robotic RIRS, the ureteroscope was attached to the robotic slave device. The Auriga XL™ Holmium laser was used for lithotripsy. Lasering and stone retrieval time were measured. Kidneys and ureters were inspected for injury at the end of each session.

Results:

For the expert, both lasering and stone retrieval by manual RIRS were quicker than by robotic RIRS (22.8 ± 11.0 s/stone vs 234.5 ± 102.5 s/stone, p = 0.02; 41.5 ± 0.5 s/stone vs 79.3 ± 8.1 s/stone, p = 0.02). For the intermediate and beginner, lasering and stone retrieval times were not significantly different between manual and robotic procedures (127.8 ± 93.2 s/stone vs 284.8 ± 112.3 s/stone, p = 0.08; 86.0 ± 30.5 s/stone vs 84.1 ± 21.4 s/stone, p = 0.92). All stones were removed. Grade 1 ureteral and renal injuries occurred in both manual RIRS and robotic RIRS.

Conclusions:

The laser lithotripsy using the easyUretero robotic system is safe and feasible in a porcine model, even for less-experienced surgeons.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Litotripsia a Laser Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Litotripsia a Laser Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article