Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Scoping review of rapid health technology assessment].
Li, Miao-Miao; Wu, Xue; Xu, Si-Min; Dai, Ze-Qi; Zhao, Hui; Liao, Xing.
Afiliação
  • Li MM; Center for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine,Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700,China Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700,China.
  • Wu X; Center for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine,Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700,China.
  • Xu SM; Center for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine,Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700,China.
  • Dai ZQ; Center for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine,Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700,China.
  • Zhao H; China Center for Evidence-based Traditional Chinese Medicine Beijing 100700,China.
  • Liao X; Center for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine,Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing 100700,China.
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi ; 47(12): 3125-3135, 2022 Jun.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35851103
ABSTRACT
This study aims to summarize the research on rapid health technology assessment(RHTA) based on scoping review, which is expected to serve as a reference for future research on RHTA. First, articles on RHTA were retrieved from both Chinese and English databases. After data screening and extraction by two personnel independently, descriptive analysis was conducted on the results, and evidence distribution was analyzed based on tables, bar charts, line charts, radar charts, and pie charts. Finally, a total of 82 eligible articles were included and the characteristics were as follows.(1) Articles on RHTA were mainly published from 2011 to 2022. The number of articles showed an obvious increase from 2014 and surged in 2019.(2) Among the journals with the above RHTA papers published, Chinese Journal of New Drugs(21.5%), Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospitals of China(16.9%), and Chinese Pharmacy(15.4%) topped the Chinese journals in the number of the papers, while International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care(23.5%), Reviews in Medical Virology(11.8%), and Value in Health(11.8%) came out on top in the English journals.(3)The RHTA of drugs(especially western medicine)(68.7%) dominated the eligible articles, followed by the RHTA of therapy technology(13.1%), detection technology(5.1%), and diagnosis technology(1.0%). There was a significant gap in the number of studies among different health technology categories and an imbalance in the types of health technologies involved in the overall RHTA studies.(4) RHTA of tumors has been the research focus in recent years. In summary, RHTA plays a positive role in rapid health decision-making, but there is a lack of primary data sources at present. Compared with the systematic review, Meta-analysis, and pharmacoeconomic studies, a few reports on health technology assessment(HTA) were included. In the future, research on the evaluation of the safety, efficacy, cost effectiveness and social applicability of health technologies should be further strengthened.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Publicações / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Publicações / Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article