Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options effective across socioeconomic groups? A mega-analysis.
Pechey, Rachel; Hollands, Gareth J; Reynolds, James P; Jebb, Susan A; Marteau, Theresa M.
Afiliação
  • Pechey R; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. rachel.pechey@phc.ox.ac.uk.
  • Hollands GJ; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Reynolds JP; EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, WC1H 0NR, UK.
  • Jebb SA; School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
  • Marteau TM; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ; 19(1): 88, 2022 07 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35854353
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Availability interventions have been hypothesised to make limited demands on conscious processes and, as a result, to be less likely to generate health inequalities than cognitively-oriented interventions. Here we synthesise existing evidence to examine whether the impact of altering the availability of healthier vs. less-healthy options differs by socioeconomic position.

METHODS:

Individual-level data (21,360 observations from 7,375 participants) from six studies (conducted online (n = 4) and in laboratories (n = 2)) were pooled for mega-analysis. Multilevel logistic regressions analysed the impact of altering the availability of healthier options on selection of a healthier (rather than a less-healthy) option by socioeconomic position, assessed by (a) education and (b) income.

RESULTS:

Participants had over threefold higher odds of selecting a healthier option when the available range was predominantly healthier compared to selections when the range offered was predominantly less-healthy (odds ratio (OR) 3.8; 95%CIs 3.5, 4.1). Less educated participants were less likely to select healthier options in each availability condition (ORs 0.75-0.85; all p < 0.005), but there was no evidence of differences in healthier option selection by income. Compared to selections when the range offered was predominantly less-healthy, when predominantly healthier options were available there was a 31% increase in selecting healthier options for the most educated group vs 27% for the least educated. This modest degree of increased responsiveness in the most educated group appeared only to occur when healthier options were predominant. There was no evidence of any differential response to the intervention by income.

CONCLUSION:

Increasing the proportion of healthier options available increases the selection of healthier options across socioeconomic positions. Availability interventions may have a slightly larger beneficial effect on those with the highest levels of education in settings when healthier options predominate.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nível de Saúde Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nível de Saúde Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article