Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosis, staging, and treatment response assessment of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Torkian, Pooya; Mansoori, Bahar; Hillengass, Jens; Azadbakht, Javid; Rashedi, Sina; Lee, Sarah S; Amini, Behrang; Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea; Chalian, Majid.
Afiliação
  • Torkian P; Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Mansoori B; Department of Radiology, Division Abdominal Imaging, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
  • Hillengass J; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • Azadbakht J; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Rashedi S; Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Lee SS; Department of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
  • Amini B; Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Bonaffini PA; Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
  • Chalian M; University Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Skeletal Radiol ; 52(3): 565-583, 2023 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881152
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the initial diagnosis, staging, and assessment of treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The primary endpoints were defined as the diagnostic performance of DWI for disease detection, staging of MM, and assessing response to treatment in these patients.

RESULTS:

Of 5881 initially reviewed publications, 33 were included in the final qualitative and quantitative meta-analysis. The diagnostic performance of DWI in the detection of patients with MM revealed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 86% (95% CI 84-89) and 63% (95% CI 56-70), respectively, with a diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of 14.98 (95% CI 4.24-52.91). The pooled risk difference of 0.19 (95% CI - 0.04-0.42) was reported in favor of upstaging with DWI compared to conventional MRI (P value = 0.1). Treatment response evaluation and ADCmean value changes across different studies showed sensitivity and specificity of approximately 78% (95% CI 72-83) and 73% (95% CI 61-83), respectively, with a diagnostic OR of 7.21 in distinguishing responders from non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS:

DWI is not only a promising tool for the diagnosis of MM, but it is also useful in the initial staging and re-staging of the disease and treatment response assessment. This can aid clinicians with earlier initiation or change in treatment strategy, which could have prognostic significance for patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética / Mieloma Múltiplo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética / Mieloma Múltiplo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article