Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intranasal Midazolam With Lidocaine for Sedation in Pediatric Myringotomy and Tube Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ullman, David A; Victory, Jennifer M; Scribani, Melissa B.
Afiliação
  • Ullman DA; Anesthesiology, Bassett Healthcare Network, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Cooperstown, USA.
  • Victory JM; Anesthesiology, Bassett Healthcare Network, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Cooperstown, USA.
  • Scribani MB; Anesthesiology, Bassett Healthcare Network, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Cooperstown, USA.
Cureus ; 14(7): e27181, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35910700
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intranasal midazolam (INM) sedation for children has been associated with side effects. This prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed whether the addition of lidocaine to INM (INM+L) affected efficacy or discharge time among pediatric patients undergoing elective bilateral myringotomy and tube placement (BMT). METHODS: This trial enrolled children aged between 18 months to seven years undergoing BMT, physical status class 1 or 2, in a single academic medical center. Interventions were placebo (intranasal saline), INM only (0.2mg/kg of INM concentration 5mg/ml), and INM+L (0.2mg/kg INM with addition of lidocaine 4% based on 25% of midazolam volume). Outcomes included post-anesthesia care unit times, observed behavioral distress (OBD) visual analog scale (VAS) (by nurse and parent), and sedation scores by certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) and registered nurse (RN). RESULTS: Forty-two subjects were included, 14 in each group, with 52% female, 41% physical status 2, and an average age of 2.7 years. Post-anesthesia care unit times averaged 36.5 minutes (range 15-132 minutes), with no delay in discharge with INM or INM+L versus placebo (p=0.88). Verbal complaints were highest among INM+L at the time of administration (p=0.01). RN-scored OBD at one minute post administration differed significantly across the three groups (p=0.01). Parental OBD scores did not differ across treatment groups. Agitation was greatest at time of induction of anesthesia in the placebo group (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of licodaine to INM does not adversely influence time to discharge and does not reduce side effects, improve efficacy, or change duration of action of INM.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article