Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rapid titration of VNS therapy reduces time-to-response in epilepsy.
Tzadok, Michal; Verner, Ryan; Kann, Lennart; Tungala, Deepika; Gordon, Charles; El Tahry, Riëm; Fahoum, Firas.
Afiliação
  • Tzadok M; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Pediatric Neurology Unit, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. Electronic address: Michal.Tzadok@sheba.health.gov.il.
  • Verner R; LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom.
  • Kann L; LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom.
  • Tungala D; LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom.
  • Gordon C; LivaNova PLC (or a subsidiary), London, Great Britain, United Kingdom.
  • El Tahry R; Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium; Centre for Refractory Epilepsy, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Fahoum F; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Epilepsy Behav ; 134: 108861, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35963047
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Common titration strategies for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) prioritize monitoring of tolerability during small increases in stimulation intensity over several months. Prioritization of tolerability is partially based on how quickly side effects can be perceived and reported by patients, and the delayed onset of clinical benefits from VNS. However, many practices assess the clinical benefit of VNS at one year after implantation, and excessive caution during the titration phase can significantly delay target dosing or prevent a patient from reaching a therapeutic dose entirely.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to characterize the relationship between titration speed and the onset of clinical response to VNS.

METHODS:

To assess differences between more aggressive titration strategies and more conservative ones, we analyzed the relationship between time-to-dose and time-to-response using a weighted Cox regression. The target dose was empirically defined as 1.625 mA output current delivered at 250 microsecond pulse widths at 20 Hz. Patient-level outcomes and dosing data were segregated into fast (<3 months), medium (3-6 months), and slow (>6 months) cohorts based on their titration speed.

RESULTS:

The statistical model revealed a significant relationship between titration speed and onset of clinical response, defined as a 50% reduction from baseline in seizure frequency. Frequency of adverse events reported between each cohort trended toward higher rates of adverse events in adults who were titrated quickly; however, the pediatric population appeared to be more tolerant of titration at any speed.

CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis indicates that faster titration yields faster onset of clinical benefit and is especially practical in the pediatric population, though attempts to accelerate adult titration may still be warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia / Estimulação do Nervo Vago Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Epilepsia / Estimulação do Nervo Vago Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article