A historical review of the effects of dental radiography on pregnant patients.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The safety of dental radiography performed on pregnant patients has been a controversial topic since the 1960s. This review synthesizes and consolidates findings, from 1957 through 2021, of the effects dental ionizing radiation could have on a pregnant patient and in utero birth defects. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED Using PubMed, the following key words were searched pregnancy, radiology, radiograph, radiation dose, fetus, x-ray, and dental. Criteria evaluation was done on the basis of availability, completeness, quality, relevance, technicality (that is, dental radiography), topicality (that is, pregnant patients), and usability. These results were then filtered on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data as well as the period (decades within the historical framework). The final selection of relevant literature consisted of various studies including cohort studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, and other narrative reviews. RESULTS: If properly performed, the amount of ionizing radiation produced during dental radiographic procedures is so low that it is unlikely to reach the teratogenic threshold. Thus, dental ionizing radiation is unlikely to cause in utero birth defects because it has been detected to have a deterministic (not stochastic) effect. With this information and historical context, this article shows that necessary dental radiography is safe at any stage during pregnancy, as long as proper safety equipment is appropriately used. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS As technology advances, more research can further clarify ionizing radiation safety for pregnant patients and its potential effects on in utero birth defects, improving overall oral health care. The dental community must remain educated about current ionizing radiation safety guidelines to make better-informed decisions and successfully provide proper oral health care to pregnant patients.