Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Coronary revascularization after surgical aortic valve replacement.
Çelik, Mevlüt; Durko, Andras P; Head, Stuart J; Mahtab, Edris A F; van Mieghem, Nicolas M; Cummins, Paul A; Kappetein, Arie P; Bogers, Ad J J C.
Afiliação
  • Çelik M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Durko AP; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Head SJ; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mahtab EAF; Medtronic, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • van Mieghem NM; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Cummins PA; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kappetein AP; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bogers AJJC; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
JTCVS Open ; 3: 91-101, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36003865
Objective: It remains unclear how often coronary revascularization is necessary after aortic valve interventions, either by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. However, these data are relevant for treatment and prosthesis choice. The authors sought to analyze the incidence and characteristics of coronary revascularization after SAVR during follow-up. Methods: Of 2256 patients undergoing isolated SAVR between 1987 and 2015, 420 patients (mean age 56.9 ± 15.5 years, 66.9% male) were followed at the Erasmus Medical Center. Incidence, predictors, and characteristics of coronary revascularization were analyzed. Cumulative incidence of revascularization was assessed using a competing risk approach. Results: Mean follow-up after SAVR was 17.2 years (total of 4541 patient-years). A total of 24 patients underwent 28 procedures of revascularization. The cumulative incidence of revascularization after SAVR was 0.5%, 2.2%, 4.1%, and 6.9% at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively. The linearized rate of revascularization was 6.2 per 1000 patient-years. Percutaneous coronary intervention was the most common revascularization method (64%; N = 18/28). Revascularization before SAVR (N = 36/420; of whom 27 percutaneous coronary intervention) was an independent predictor of revascularization during follow-up (hazard ratio, 6.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-17.1; P < .001). Conclusions: After SAVR, the rate of coronary revascularization was 6.9% (N = 24/420) at 20-year follow-up. Patients were at particular risk if they had undergone previous revascularization before SAVR. These data may furthermore be relevant to the transcatheter aortic valve replacement population.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article