Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the effects of added sugar labels on food purchasing behaviour in Australian parents: An online randomised controlled trial.
Riesenberg, Devorah; Peeters, Anna; Backholer, Kathryn; Martin, Jane; Ni Mhurchu, Cliona; Blake, Miranda R.
Afiliação
  • Riesenberg D; Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Peeters A; Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Backholer K; Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Martin J; Obesity Policy Coalition, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ni Mhurchu C; National Institute for Health Innovation, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Blake MR; The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0271435, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36006973
BACKGROUND: Evidence of the effects of front-of-pack added sugar labelling remains limited, especially for foods other than sugary drinks. More information is needed about which labels are likely to be most effective in reducing intended purchases of products with higher added sugar content in realistic contexts to inform policymakers' decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of added sugar labels on intended purchases of high sugar breakfast cereals, yoghurt, and non-alcoholic beverages. METHODS: Australian parents who were regular purchasers of relevant product categories completed an online parallel randomised controlled trial from 31 August 2020 to 13 February 2021. Participants selected their intended purchase from 10 products in each of packaged beverages, breakfast cereal, and yoghurt categories after randomisation to one of seven added sugar labelling conditions in current use or under consideration by the Australian Government. Logistic regressions assessed differences between intervention and control conditions in the odds of intended purchases of a high sugar product. RESULTS: 2825 eligible participants were randomised with 2582 valid surveys analysed (Control n = 367; 'Nutrition Information Panel (NIP) with Added Sugar' n = 364; 'Teaspoons of Sugar' n = 369; 'Warning' n = 371; 'Health Star Rating (HSR) using Total Sugar' n = 368; 'HSR with Added Sugar' n = 371; 'Sugar in the Ingredients List' n = 372). No consistent effects were found on intended purchases of high sugar products overall or within product categories for any of the tested labels compared to controls (overall, 'NIP with Added Sugar': OR 1.00 [95%CI 0.83,1.20]; 'Teaspoons of Sugar': 0.94[0.80,1.11]; 'Warning': 1.10[0.93,1.30]; 'HSR with Total Sugar': 1.01[0.85,1.21]; 'HSR with Added Sugar': 1.09[0.92,1.30]; 'Sugar in the Ingredients List': 1.01[0.85,1.21]). CONCLUSIONS: Findings reinforce the importance of ensuring nutrition labelling policies are introduced as part of a suite of interventions to influence both consumer and manufacturer behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12620000858998. Registered 28 August 2020, https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12620000858998.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento do Consumidor / Açúcares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento do Consumidor / Açúcares Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article