Comparing outcomes of cholecystectomies in white vs. minority patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the disparity between white and minority patients undergoing cholecystectomies, including presentation, outcomes, and financial burden. METHODS: This was an IRB approved retrospective review of all cholecystectomies at an academic medical center from 2013 to 2018. Data collected include demographics, insurance type, charge of admission, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 1539 patients underwent cholecystectomies. Of those, 36.9% were white and 63.1% were minority. Minority patients presented at a younger age than white patients (45.5 vs 53.9, p < 0.01) and required emergent admission (76.2% vs 68.4%, p < 0.01). No significant difference was found for clinical outcomes between white and minority. Minority patients were more commonly uninsured (32.1%). Among the uninsured, self-pay had a higher charge than emergency MediCal (by 5.46 per 1000 dollars). CONCLUSION: Minority patients are more commonly disadvantaged at presentation and charged more due to insurance status despite similar outcomes after cholecystectomies.