Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Bedside and Video-Based Capillary Refill Time Assessment in Children.
Nickel, Amanda J; Hunter, Ryan Brandon; Jiang, Shen; Boulet, John R; Hanks, Jasmine; Napolitano, Natalie; Nadkarni, Vinay M; Nishisaki, Akira.
Afiliação
  • Nickel AJ; From the Department of Respiratory Care.
  • Hunter RB; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Jiang S; Nihon Kohden Innovation Center, Boston, MA.
  • Boulet JR; National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Conshohocken.
  • Hanks J; Clinical Research Support Office, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
  • Napolitano N; From the Department of Respiratory Care.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(10): 506-510, 2022 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36083194
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Capillary refill time (CRT) to assess peripheral perfusion in children with suspected shock may be subject to poor reproducibility. Our objectives were to compare video-based and bedside CRT assessment using a standardized protocol and evaluate interrater and intrarater consistency of video-based CRT (VB-CRT) assessment. We hypothesized that measurement errors associated with raters would be low for both standardized bedside CRT and VB-CRT as well as VB-CRT across raters.

METHODS:

Ninety-nine children (aged 1-12 y) had 5 consecutive bedside CRT assessments by an experienced critical care clinician following a standardized protocol. Each CRT assessment was video recorded on a black background. Thirty video clips (10 with bedside CRT < 1 s, 10 with CRT 1-2 s, and 10 with CRT > 2 s) were randomly selected and presented to 10 clinicians twice in randomized order. They were instructed to push a button when they visualized release of compression and completion of a capillary refill. The correlation and absolute difference between bedside and VB-CRT were assessed. Consistency across raters and within each rater was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Generalizability study was performed to evaluate sources of variation.

RESULTS:

We found moderate agreement between bedside and VB-CRT observations (r = 0.65; P < 0.001). The VB-CRT values were shorter by 0.17 s (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.25; P < 0.001) on average compared with bedside CRT. There was moderate agreement in VB-CRT across raters (ICC = 0.61). Consistency of repeated VB-CRT within each rater was moderate (ICC = 0.71). Generalizability study revealed the source of largest variance was from individual patient video clips (57%), followed by interaction of the VB-CRT reviewer and patient video clip (10.7%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Bedside and VB-CRT observations showed moderate consistency. Using video-based assessment, moderate consistency was also observed across raters and within each rater. Further investigation to standardize and automate CRT measurement is warranted.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hemodinâmica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hemodinâmica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article