Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Colorectal cancer screening utilization among breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors.
Tsai, Meng-Han; Moore, Justin X; Odhiambo, Lorriane A; Andrzejak, Sydney E; Tingen, Martha S.
Afiliação
  • Tsai MH; Cancer Prevention, Control, and Population Health Program, Georgia Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Boulevard CN-2116, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA. metsai@augusta.edu.
  • Moore JX; Georgia Prevention Institute, Augusta University, 1457 Walton Way, Augusta, GA, 30901, USA. metsai@augusta.edu.
  • Odhiambo LA; Cancer Prevention, Control, and Population Health Program, Georgia Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Boulevard CN-2116, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
  • Andrzejak SE; Institute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
  • Tingen MS; Institute of Public and Preventive Health, Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2022 Oct 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36217067
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To examine whether sociodemographic characteristics, access to care, risk behavior factors, and chronic health conditions were associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization among breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors.

METHODS:

We analyzed the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data on 9780 eligible cancer survivors. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were applied to assess the association between guideline-concordant CRC screening and the mentioned characteristics.

RESULTS:

Overall, 81.9%, 65%, 88%,78.1%, and 80.1% of breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors received CRC screening, respectively (p-value < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, breast, cervical, and skin cancer survivors aged 60 years or older were associated with higher odds of receiving CRC screening. Respondents that had their recency of routine checkup two or more years before had lower odds of having CRC screening among cervical (OR = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.22), prostate (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.49), and skin cancer (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.70) survivors. The presence of chronic diseases was also associated with guideline-concordant CRC screening among breast, prostate, and skin cancer survivors.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings provide important evidence on potential factors that are associated with guideline-concordant CRC screening utilization across different cancer survivors, which include older age, recency of routine checkup, and multiple chronic diseases. Moreover, variation in CRC screening utilization across cancer survivors may highlight missed opportunities for secondary cancer prevention. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Establishing clear CRC screening guidelines and including patient-provider communication on recommendation in cancer survivorship care may increase adherence to CRC screening.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article