Preoperative botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection versus component separation techniques (CST) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): A propensity-scored matched study.
Surgery
; 173(3): 756-764, 2023 03.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36229258
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Complete fascial closure significantly reduces recurrence rates and wound complications in abdominal wall reconstruction. While component separation techniques have clear effectiveness in closing large abdominal wall defects, preoperative botulinum toxin A has emerged as an adjunct to aid in fascial closure. Few data exist comparing preoperative botulinum toxin A to component separation techniques, and the aim was to do so in a matched study.METHODS:
A prospective, single-center, hernia-specific database was queried, and a 31 propensity-matched study of patients undergoing open abdominal wall reconstruction from 2016 to 2021 with botulinum toxin A versus component separation techniques was performed based on body mass index, defect width, hernia volume, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wound classification. Demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes were evaluated.RESULTS:
Matched patients included 105 component separation techniques and 35 botulinum toxin A. There was no difference in tobacco use, diabetes, or body mass index (all P > .5). Hernia defects and volume were large for both the component separation techniques and botulinum toxin A groups (mean size component separation techniques 286.2 ± 179.9 cm2 vs botulinum toxin A 289.7 ± 162.4 cm2; P = .73) (mean volume 1,498.3 + 2,043.4 cm3 vs 2,914.7 + 6,539.4 cm3; P = .35). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wound classifications were equivalent (CDC3 and 4%-39.1% vs 40.0%; P = .97). Component separation techniques were more frequently performed in European Hernia Society M1 hernias (21% vs 2.9%; P = .01). The botulinum toxin A group had fewer surgical site occurrences (32.4% vs 11.4%; P = .02) and surgical site infections (11.7% vs 0%; P = .04). In multivariate analysis, botulinum toxin A was associated with lower rates of surgical site occurrences (odds ratio = 5.3; 95% confidence interval [1.4-34.4]). There was no difference in fascial closure (90.5% vs 100%; P = .11) or recurrence (12.4% vs 2.9%; P = .10) with follow-up (22.8 + 29.7 vs 9.8 + 12.7 months; P = .13).CONCLUSION:
In a matched study comparing patients with botulinum toxin A versus component separation techniques, there was no difference in fascial closure rates or in hernia recurrence between the 2 groups. Preoperative botulinum toxin A can achieve similar outcomes as component separation techniques, while decreasing the frequency of surgical site occurrences.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A
/
Parede Abdominal
/
Hérnia Ventral
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Article