Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative effectiveness of interventional therapeutic modalities for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Chen, Xin-Long; Yu, Hai-Chuan; Fan, Qi-Gang; Yuan, Qi; Jiang, Wen-Kai; Rui, Shao-Zhen; Zhou, Wen-Ce.
Afiliação
  • Chen XL; Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
  • Yu HC; First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
  • Fan QG; First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
  • Yuan Q; First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
  • Jiang WK; Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
  • Rui SZ; First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
  • Zhou WC; Department of General Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett ; 24(4): 366, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36238837
ABSTRACT
It is unclear whether hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is more efficient in the combination therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Head-to-head comparisons among HAIC-related therapies are lacking. For this network meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to April 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if they evaluated the use or prolongation of TACE or HAIC in patients with advanced HCC and reported or collected survival data. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and make direct and indirect comparisons between treatments. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to explore the efficacy of various treatment options on overall survival (OS), odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI were used for overall response rate (ORR), whereas risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI were used for serious adverse events (SAEs). The analysis of 7 trials including a total of 1,073 patients found that sorafenib with HAIC-oxaliplatin improved survival (HR=0.33, 95% CI 0.25-0.44); the ORR was also improved in patients treated with sorafenib plus HAIC-oxaliplatin and sorafenib plus PF-HAIC (OR=22.18, 95% CI 10.69-52.56; and OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.43-5.36, respectively). The incidence of liver injury was elevated in patients treated with sorafenib plus TACE (OR=5.93, 95% CI 2.70-15.41). However, no differences in the incidences of other SAEs were identified among the treatment groups. The present meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence for the comparative safety and efficacy of HAIC and TACE combined with sorafenib, and indicates the dominance of HAIC-oxaliplatin in HCC interventional therapy. However, high-quality RCTs are required to further confirm the efficacy of HAIC-oxaliplatin. The present study has been registered with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42021288497).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article