Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring a Better Adjuvant Treatment for Surgically Treated High-Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
Wang, Rongmin; Xiao, Yinping; Ma, Lingwei; Wu, Zhiyong; Xia, Hexia.
Afiliação
  • Wang R; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China, min11131990@126.com.
  • Xiao Y; Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Ma L; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Wu Z; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Xia H; Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 87(6): 398-405, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36273460
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this study was to explore a better adjuvant treatment for patients with high-grade (HG) neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas (NECC) who had undergone surgery as a primary treatment.

DESIGN:

A retrospective cohort study, which involved women diagnosed as HG-NECC, was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. All patients had undergone radical surgery and pelvic lymphadenectomy with a laparotomy or a minimally invasive surgery. An analysis was made of the prognosis of HG-NECC.

METHODS:

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method to be compared via log-rank tests. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS:

A number of 110 patients diagnosed as HG-NECC at the pathological stage IA2 to IIIC2 according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system were initially treated with a primary surgery between 2008 and 2020. The eligible patients had the median age of 42.5 years (range 22-76), with the median follow-up period of 39.6 months (range 1.0-156.6). The 5-year OS of the patients at pathological stage I, II, and III accounted for 84.9%, 85.7%, and 60.9%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed no significant differences in OS and PFS between postoperative chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone (OS p = 0.77; PFS p = 0.41). Etoposide plus platinum therapy did not improve OS when compared with platinum plus paclitaxel therapy after surgery (p = 0.71). The univariable analysis showed that chemotherapy with cycles ≥4 presented a better prognosis than with cycles <4 (OS p = 0.01; HR = 6.71; PFS p = 0.02; HR = 5.18). The multivariate analysis indicated that the cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.02; HR 0.29) were a prognostic factor for PFS.

LIMITATIONS:

A retrospective design and the absence of partial follow-up data are limitations of the study.

CONCLUSIONS:

In initially surgically treated HG-NECC, postoperative chemotherapy alone showed no inferiority when compared with chemoradiotherapy for HG-NECC, and 4+ cycles of chemotherapy tended to produce a better prognosis than 4-ones.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Carcinoma Neuroendócrino Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Carcinoma Neuroendócrino Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article