Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of guidelines for biological ancillary materials used for the manufacture of gene and cellular therapy products in Asia.
Tanaka, Toshimitsu; Yoshimura, Keiji; Chang, Ryan; Choi, Bryan; Gai, Ying; Gupta, Pawan Kumar; Kolkundkar, Udaykumar; Lee, Shing-Mou; Lee, Sunray; Liao, Wenbin; Zhao, Xiang; Takakura, Koji.
Afiliação
  • Tanaka T; Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control Regulatory Affairs, Regulatory Affairs, Astellas Pharma Inc, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: toshimitsu.tanaka@astellas.com.
  • Yoshimura K; Japan Tissue Engineering Co, Ltd, Aichi, Japan.
  • Chang R; Acepodia Inc, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Choi B; Strategic Center for Regenerative Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.
  • Gai Y; China Medicinal Biotech Association, Beijing, China.
  • Gupta PK; Stempeutics Research Pvt, Ltd, Bangalore, India.
  • Kolkundkar U; Stempeutics Research Pvt, Ltd, Bangalore, India.
  • Lee SM; EMO Biomedicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lee S; CEFO Co, Ltd, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Liao W; Baylx, Inc, Beijing, China.
  • Zhao X; Shenzhen Easeng Medical Science Co., LTD, Shenzhen, China.
  • Takakura K; Astellas Pharma Inc, Tsukuba, Japan.
Cytotherapy ; 25(2): 220-228, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36274006
BACKGROUND AIMS: Although biologiocal ancillay materials (AMs) have specific risk associated with their derivations, it plays key role to manufature cell and gene therapy (CGT) products. It is important to understand the regulation relevant to AMs for developers. METHODS: The authors investigated the guidelines and pharmacopeia (hereinafter referred to as "guidelines") for biological AMs used for the manufacture of CGT products in Asia (China, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan). In addition, the authors benchmarked the relevant guidelines in the United States (US) and European Union (EU). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: The guidelines could be classified into two types based on whether specific AMs are scoped: (i) general guidelines for risk assessment of AMs and (ii) guidelines for specific AMs. The authors compared the risk categories for each type of AM provided in the general guidelines between the US and China and the specific requirements for bovine serum and trypsin in the guidelines of China, Japan, Taiwan, US and EU. The authors further compiled in-depth descriptions of the respective regulations in China, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. There is limited availability of some guidelines for specific AMs. Moreover, there are no common requirements established across the surveyed countries and regions. Therefore, the authors suggest a risk assessment approach for AMs with consideration of their biological origin and traceability, production steps applied and ability to control or remove AMs from the final medicinal product over the CGT manufacturing process.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: União Europeia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: União Europeia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article