Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Artificial intelligence with magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jia, Lu-Lu; Zheng, Qing-Yong; Tian, Jin-Hui; He, Di-Liang; Zhao, Jian-Xin; Zhao, Lian-Ping; Huang, Gang.
Afiliação
  • Jia LL; The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
  • Zheng QY; Evidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Tian JH; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • He DL; The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
  • Zhao JX; The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
  • Zhao LP; Department of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
  • Huang G; Department of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Front Oncol ; 12: 1026216, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36313696
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models with magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) in predicting pathological complete response(pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Furthermore, assessed the methodological quality of the models. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of science for studies published before 21 June 2022, without any language restrictions. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity using random-effects models, I2 values were used to measure heterogeneity, and subgroup analyses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: We selected 21 papers for inclusion in the meta-analysis from 1562 retrieved publications, with a total of 1873 people in the validation groups. The meta-analysis showed that AI models based on MRI predicted pCR to nCRT in patients with rectal cancer: a pooled area under the curve (AUC) 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), sensitivity of 0.82(95% CI,0.71-0.90), pooled specificity 0.86(95% CI,0.80-0.91). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled AUC of the deep learning(DL) model was 0.97, the pooled AUC of the radiomics model was 0.85; the pooled AUC of the combined model with clinical factors was 0.92, and the pooled AUC of the radiomics model alone was 0.87. The mean RQS score of the included studies was 10.95, accounting for 30.4% of the total score. Conclusions: Radiomics is a promising noninvasive method with high value in predicting pathological response to nCRT in patients with rectal cancer. DL models have higher predictive accuracy than radiomics models, and combined models incorporating clinical factors have higher diagnostic accuracy than radiomics models alone. In the future, prospective, large-scale, multicenter investigations using radiomics approaches will strengthen the diagnostic power of pCR. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021285630.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article