Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developing an implementation fidelity checklist for a vocational rehabilitation intervention.
Powers, Katie; Clarke, Sara; Phillips, Julie; Holmes, Jain A; Cripps, Rachel; Craven, Kristelle; Farrin, Amanda; das Nair, Roshan; Radford, Kathryn A.
Afiliação
  • Powers K; Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. katie.powers@nottingham.ac.uk.
  • Clarke S; Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Phillips J; Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Holmes JA; Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Cripps R; School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Craven K; Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Farrin A; Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • das Nair R; Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Radford KA; Health Division, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.
Pilot Feasibility Stud ; 8(1): 234, 2022 Nov 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36324137
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite growing numbers of studies reporting the efficacy of complex interventions and their implementation, many studies fail to report information on implementation fidelity or describe how fidelity measures used within the study were developed. This study aimed to develop a fidelity checklist for measuring the implementation fidelity of an early, stroke-specialist vocational rehabilitation intervention (ESSVR) in the RETAKE trial.

METHODS:

To develop the fidelity measure, previous checklists were reviewed to inform the assessment structure, and core intervention components were extracted from intervention descriptions into a checklist, which was ratified by eight experts in fidelity measurement and complex interventions. Guidance notes were generated to assist with checklist completion. To test the measure, two researchers independently applied the checklist to fifteen stroke survivor intervention case notes using retrospective observational case review. The scoring was assessed for interrater reliability.

RESULTS:

A fidelity checklist containing 21 core components and 6 desirable components across 4 stages of intervention delivery was developed with corresponding guidance notes. Interrater reliability of each checklist item ranged from moderate to perfect (Cohen's kappa 0.69-1).

CONCLUSIONS:

The resulting checklist to assess implementation fidelity is fit for assessing the delivery of vocational rehabilitation for stroke survivors using retrospective observational case review. The checklist proved its utility as a measure of fidelity and may be used to inform the design of future implementation strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN12464275. Registered on 13 March 2018.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article