Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sequential intracorneal ring segment implantation followed by transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and corneal cross-linking.
Debono, C; Smadja, D; Saunier, V; Touboul, D.
Afiliação
  • Debono C; Keratoconus National Reference Center (CRNK), Anterior Segment unit, university center hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: caroline.debono@chu-bordeaux.fr.
  • Smadja D; Department of ophthalmology, refractive surgery unit, Shaare Zedek medical center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Saunier V; Keratoconus National Reference Center (CRNK), Anterior Segment unit, university center hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Touboul D; Keratoconus National Reference Center (CRNK), Anterior Segment unit, university center hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 45(10): 1117-1125, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36334941
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the safety and visual outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation followed by transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (te-PTK) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with mild keratoconus.

METHODS:

Patients with mild keratoconus and contact lens intolerance who underwent sequential ICRS implantation followed by phototherapeutic keratectomy and corneal CXL between April 2015 and July 2018 were retrospectively included in the study. Refractive and visual outcomes, satisfaction questionnaire and complications were recorded at the last follow-up (mean 9.5 months postoperatively).

RESULTS:

Twenty eyes of 17 patients were enrolled, including 5 women and 15 men. The mean time between the two procedures was 16 months. Based on values before the first procedure and 9.5 months after the second procedure, significant improvements were noted in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (0.80±0.35 logMAR vs. 0.46±0.38 logMAR), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (0.38±0.23 logMAR vs. 0.13±0.16 logMAR), maximal K (56.11±4 diopters [D] vs. 50.6±3.56 D), mean K (51.87±3.43 D vs. 48.45±2.91 D), cylinder (7.99±3.94 D vs. 4.23±3.49 D), and spherical equivalent (-3.84±3.36 D vs. -0.99±2.15 D) (P<0.01). Among the outcomes, we noted 5 (25%) superficial corneal scarring (haze); 75% of eyes gained>=1 logMAR line of CDVA. In all, 94.5% of patients reported that they were satisfied with their outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Combining ICRS implantation followed by te-PTK and corneal CXL appears to be a safe and effective approach for improving visual outcomes and quality of life in keratoconus patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ceratocone Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ceratocone Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article