Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discrete choice experiment to investigate preferences for psychological intervention in cardiac rehabilitation.
Shields, Gemma E; Wells, Adrian; Wright, Stuart; Vass, Caroline M; Doherty, Patrick Joseph; Capobianco, Lora; Davies, Linda M.
Afiliação
  • Shields GE; Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK gemma.shields@manchester.ac.uk.
  • Wells A; School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Wright S; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Vass CM; Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Doherty PJ; Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Capobianco L; RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK.
  • Davies LM; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(11): e062503, 2022 11 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36343991
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is offered to people who recently experienced a cardiac event, and often comprises of exercise, education and psychological care. This stated preference study aimed to investigate preferences for attributes of a psychological therapy intervention in CR. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted and recruited a general population sample and a trial sample. DCE attributes included the modality (group or individual), healthcare professional providing care, information provided prior to therapy, location and the cost to the National Health Service (NHS). Participants were asked to choose between two hypothetical designs of therapy, with a separate opt-out included. A mixed logit model was used to analyse preferences. Cost to the NHS was used to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for aspects of the intervention design. RESULTS: Three hundred and four participants completed the DCE (general public sample (n=262, mean age 47, 48% female) and trial sample (n=42, mean age 66, 45% female)). A preference for receiving psychological therapy was demonstrated by both samples (general population WTP £1081; 95% CI £957 to £1206). The general population appeared to favour individual therapy (WTP £213; 95% CI £160 to £266), delivered by a CR professional (WTP £48; 9% % CI £4 to £93) and with a lower cost (ß=-0.002; p<0.001). Participants preferred to avoid options where no information was received prior to starting therapy (WTP -£106; 95% CI -£153 to -£59). Results for the location attribute were variable and challenging to interpret. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates a preference for psychological therapy as part of a programme of CR, as participants were more likely to opt-in to therapy. Results indicate that some aspects of the delivery which may be important to participants can be tailored to design a psychological therapy. Preference heterogeneity is an issue which may prevent a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to psychological therapy in CR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Preferência do Paciente / Reabilitação Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Preferência do Paciente / Reabilitação Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article