Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach-the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study.
Jovanovic Maric, Jovana; Kolarevic, Stoimir; Dordevic, Jelena; Sunjog, Karolina; Nikolic, Ivan; Maric, Ana; Ilic, Marija; Simonovic, Predrag; Alygizakis, Nikiforos; Ng, Kelsey; Oswald, Peter; Slobodnik, Jaroslav; Zegura, Bojana; Vukovic-Gacic, Branka; Paunovic, Momir; Kracun-Kolarevic, Margareta.
Afiliação
  • Jovanovic Maric J; University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research "Sinisa Stankovic", National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Department of Hydroecology and Water Protection, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Kolarevic S; University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research "Sinisa Stankovic", National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Department of Hydroecology and Water Protection, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Dordevic J; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Chair of Microbiology, Center for Genotoxicology and Ecogenotoxicology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Sunjog K; University of Belgrade, Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, Department of Biology and Inland Waters Protection, Kneza Viseslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Nikolic I; University of Belgrade, Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, Department of Biology and Inland Waters Protection, Kneza Viseslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Maric A; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Chair of Microbiology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Ilic M; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Simonovic P; University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research "Sinisa Stankovic", National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Department of Hydroecology and Water Protection, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Alygizakis N; University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Ng K; University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research "Sinisa Stankovic", National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Oswald P; Environmental Institute, Okruzna 784/2, 97241 Kos, Slovak Republic.
  • Slobodnik J; Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece.
  • Zegura B; Environmental Institute, Okruzna 784/2, 97241 Kos, Slovak Republic.
  • Vukovic-Gacic B; Environmental Institute, Okruzna 784/2, 97241 Kos, Slovak Republic.
  • Paunovic M; Environmental Institute, Okruzna 784/2, 97241 Kos, Slovak Republic.
  • Kracun-Kolarevic M; National Institute of Biology, Department of Genetic Toxicology and Cancer Biology, Vecna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mutagenesis ; 38(1): 21-32, 2023 02 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36367406
Environmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article