Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bioactivated gellan gum hydrogels affect cellular rearrangement and cell response in vascular co-culture and subcutaneous implant models.
Gering, Christine; Párraga, Jenny; Vuorenpää, Hanna; Botero, Lucía; Miettinen, Susanna; Kellomäki, Minna.
Afiliação
  • Gering C; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. Electronic address: christine.gering@tuni.fi.
  • Párraga J; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Vuorenpää H; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Botero L; Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Miettinen S; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Kellomäki M; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Biomater Adv ; 143: 213185, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36371972
ABSTRACT
Hydrogels are suitable soft tissue mimics and capable of creating pre-vascularized tissues, that are useful for in vitro tissue engineering and in vivo regenerative medicine. The polysaccharide gellan gum (GG) offers an intriguing matrix material but requires bioactivation in order to support cell attachment and transfer of biomechanical cues. Here, four versatile modifications were investigated Purified NaGG; avidin-modified NaGG combined with biotinylated fibronectin (NaGG-avd); oxidized GG (GGox) covalently modified with carbohydrazide-modified gelatin (gelaCDH) or adipic hydrazide-modified gelatin (gelaADH). All materials were subjected to rheological analysis to assess their viscoelastic properties, using a time sweep for gelation analysis, and subsequent amplitude sweep of the formed hydrogels. The sweeps show that NaGG and NaGG-avd are rather brittle, while gelatin-based hydrogels are more elastic. The degradation of preformed hydrogels in cell culture medium was analyzed with an amplitude sweep and show that gelatin-containing hydrogels degrade more dramatically. A co-culture of GFP-tagged HUVEC and hASC was performed to induce vascular network formation in 3D for up to 14 days. Immunofluorescence staining of the αSMA+ network showed increased cell response to gelatin-GG networks, while the NaGG-based hydrogels did not allow for the elongation of cells. Preformed, 3D hydrogels disks were implanted to subcutaneous rat skin pockets to evaluate biological in vivo response. As visible from the hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue slices, all materials are biocompatible, however gelatin-GG hydrogels produced a stronger host response. This work indicates, that besides the biochemical cues added to the GG hydrogels, also their viscoelasticity greatly influences the biological response.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hidrogéis / Gelatina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hidrogéis / Gelatina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article