The medium-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy on gait compared to a matched cerebral palsy non-SDR group: A follow-up study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) has been shown to improve gait in the short-term in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Further study is needed to look at the trajectory of outcomes over the longer-term. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the medium-term effects of SDR on gait compared to a matched CP non-SDR group? METHODS: Participants underwent SDR at mean age 6.3 years and completed baseline, 1-year and 5-year follow-up gait analyses. Non-SDR participants were matched at baseline. Differences were assessed within and between groups. Kinematic variables were analysed using Statistical non-Parametric Mapping (SnPM). Other gait and clinical data were analysed using Friedman's one-way repeated measure analysis of variance and a Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The initial SDR group consisted of 29 participants, reducing to 22 at 5-year follow-up. Of these, 15 (68 %) had orthopaedic surgeries either concurrent with or in the intervening period since the SDR, mean 3.3 procedures per participant. The initial non- SDR group had 18 participants, reducing to 17 at 5-year follow-up. Of these, 13 (76 %) had orthopaedic surgeries, mean 5.7 procedures. At 1-year follow-up the SDR group had significantly improved knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion, foot progression, Gait Deviation Index, and normalised step length compared to baseline, p < 0.05, and outcomes were maintained at 5-years. At 1-year follow-up the non-SDR group kinematic patterns were unchanged, but at 5-year follow-up this group demonstrated significantly improved knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion and foot progression. There were no significant kinematic differences between the SDR and the non-SDR group at medium-term follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: We have documented the trajectory of gait outcomes post-SDR over 3 assessments and found that short-term gait changes endured in the medium-term. However, kinematic changes were similar to a non-SDR group undergoing routine and orthopaedic care. These outcomes are important to guide surgical decision making and to manage treatment goals and expectations.