Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up.
Karlsson, Thomas; Försth, Peter; Skorpil, Mikael; Pazarlis, Konstantinos; Öhagen, Patrik; Michaëlsson, Karl; Sandén, Bengt.
Afiliação
  • Karlsson T; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Försth P; Orthopaedic Clinic, Spine Section, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Skorpil M; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Pazarlis K; Orthopaedic Clinic, Spine Section, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Öhagen P; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Michaëlsson K; Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Sandén B; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bone Joint J ; 104-B(12): 1343-1351, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36453045
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.

METHODS:

The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study (SSSS) was conducted between 2006 and 2012 at five public and two private hospitals. Six centres participated in this two-year MRI follow-up. We randomized 222 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent levels into two groups, decompression alone and decompression with fusion. The presence or absence of a preoperative spondylolisthesis was noted. A new stenosis on two-year MRI was used as the primary outcome, defined as a dural sac cross-sectional area ≤ 75 mm2 at the operated level (restenosis) and/or at the level above (proximal adjacent level stenosis).

RESULTS:

A total of 211 patients underwent surgery at a mean age of 66 years (69% female) 103 were treated by decompression with fusion and 108 by decompression alone. A two-year MRI was available for 176 (90%) of the eligible patients. A new stenosis at the operated and/or adjacent level occurred more frequently after decompression and fusion than after decompression alone (47% vs 29%; p = 0.020). The difference remained in the subgroup with a preoperative spondylolisthesis, (48% vs 24%; p = 0.020), but did not reach significance for those without (45% vs 35%; p = 0.488). Proximal adjacent level stenosis was more common after fusion than after decompression alone (44% vs 17%; p < 0.001). Restenosis at the operated level was less frequent after fusion than decompression alone (4% vs 14%; p = 0.036). Vertebral slip increased by 1.1 mm after decompression alone, regardless of whether a preoperative spondylolisthesis was present or not.

CONCLUSION:

Adding fusion to a decompression increased the rate of new stenosis on two-year MRI, even when a spondylolisthesis was present preoperatively. This supports decompression alone as the preferred method of surgery for spinal stenosis, whether or not a degenerative spondylolisthesis is present preoperatively.Cite this article Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12)1343-1351.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Espondilolistese Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose Espinal / Espondilolistese Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article