Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reproductive genetics laboratory may impact euploid blastocyst and live birth rates: a comparison of 4 national laboratories' PGT-A results from vitrified donor oocytes.
Bardos, Jonah; Kwal, Jaclyn; Caswell, Wayne; Jahandideh, Samad; Stratton, Melissa; Tucker, Michael; DeCherney, Alan; Devine, Kate; Hill, Micah; O'Brien, Jeanne E.
Afiliação
  • Bardos J; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: bardosmd@gmail.com.
  • Kwal J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Caswell W; Donor Egg Bank USA, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Jahandideh S; Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Stratton M; Donor Egg Bank USA, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Tucker M; Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland.
  • DeCherney A; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Devine K; Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland.
  • Hill M; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • O'Brien JE; Donor Egg Bank USA, Rockville, Maryland.
Fertil Steril ; 119(1): 29-35, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36460523
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate potential variation in the euploid blastocyst rate and live birth rate (LBR) per single frozen euploid blastocyst transfer, among 4 unique United States reproductive genetics laboratories. Analyses were limited to blastocysts derived from vitrified donor oocytes, to minimize variation in oocyte quality.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study from 2016 to 2020.

SETTING:

Donor Egg Bank Database. PATIENT(S) Patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with donor oocytes. We excluded patients with uterine factor, male factor, or surgically extracted sperm. Only healthy women <34 years old were accepted as oocyte donors. INTERVENTION(S) Next generation sequencing platforms for chromosomal analysis MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Euploid blastocyst rate and LBR per euploid transfer. Secondary outcomes included the rate of aneuploidy, mosaic calls, biochemical pregnancy loss, and miscarriage rate. RESULT(S) A total of 2,633 embryos were included. Four laboratories had >200 embryos tested. Euploid blastocyst rate was significantly higher in laboratory A (73.6%) vs. B (63.3%), C (60.9%), and D (52.3%). Mosaic rate was significantly lower for Laboratories B (2.8%) and C (5.5%) vs. Laboratories A (9.9%) and D (11.5). The LBR was significantly higher in laboratory A (58.73%) vs. laboratory D (47.3%). There were no significant differences in the implantation or miscarriage rate among laboratories. CONCLUSION(S) In this large study, controlling for oocyte quality, some preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) laboratories report a significantly higher euploid blastocyst rate with concurrent higher LBR. This type of comparison is important as it provides insight into the role of the PGT-A process in outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate the differences in laboratory techniques and bioinformatic algorithms accounting for variable outcomes across PGT-A laboratories.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Espontâneo / Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aborto Espontâneo / Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article