Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Playing Position on Return to Sport, Functional Outcomes, and Recurrence After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Soccer Players.
Pasqualini, Ignacio; Rossi, Luciano Andrés; Brandariz, Rodrigo; Tanoira, Ignacio; Fuentes, Nora; Denard, Patrick J; Ranalletta, Maximiliano.
Afiliação
  • Pasqualini I; Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Rossi LA; Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Brandariz R; Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Tanoira I; Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Fuentes N; Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Denard PJ; Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, Oregon, USA.
  • Ranalletta M; Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 10(11): 23259671221138106, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36466593
ABSTRACT

Background:

Little attention has been paid to playing position as a risk factor for recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in soccer players.

Purpose:

To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and recurrence after ABR between goalkeepers and field position players in soccer. Study

Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A retrospective comparative cohort study was performed in soccer players who underwent ABR between January 2017 and December 2019. The minimum clinical follow-up was 2 years. Functional outcomes included the Rowe score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and shoulder-dependent sports ability measured with the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS). The difference between the post- and preoperative scores was calculated; rate and level of return to sport, recurrent instability, and revisions were also evaluated according to position played.

Results:

A total of 70 position players and 11 goalkeepers met the study criteria. Postoperative functional outcomes were significantly improved in both groups as compared with baseline (P < .001 for both), although the position players achieved significantly greater pre- to postoperative improvement (ΔVAS, -2 vs 0 points [P = .029]; ΔRowe, 45 vs 30 points [P = .046]; ΔASOSS, 45 vs 40 points [P = .028]). While all players returned to soccer, only 55% (n = 6) of goalkeepers returned to the same level versus 93% of field players (P = .003). The overall rate of recurrent instability was 8.6% but was significantly higher among goalkeepers (27.2% vs 5.7%; P = .049), and the odds of goalkeepers having a recurrence were significantly higher than field position players (odds ratio, 8.5 [95% CI, 1.2-57.2]; P = .027).

Conclusion:

Although the results of ABR were generally favorable in all soccer players, goalkeepers had significantly worse functional outcomes, a lower rate of return to the same level of sport, and a higher recurrence rate as compared with field position players.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article