Survey of Korean head and neck surgeons and endocrinologists for the surgical extent of 1.5 and 2.5 cm papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Background: The surgical extent of 1-4 cm papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is controversial. We aimed to determine the current trend in the extent of thyroidectomy and prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) for 1.5 and 2.5 cm PTC, which are the most clinically controversial sizes. Methods: The questionnaire was sent to 342 Korean Society of Head and Neck Surgery and 160 one branch of Korean Endocrine Society members from June to July 2021 by e-mail. A questionnaire included extent of thyroidectomy [hemithyroidectomy (Hemi) vs. total thyroidectomy (TT)] and pCND according to the tumor location and degree of extrathyroidal extension (ETE) at 1.5 or 2.5 cm PTC. We compared the proportion of respondents' preference for each scenario. Results: Fifty-seven of 342 surgeons and twenty-seven of 160 endocrinologists responded to the questionnaire. At 1.5 and 2.5 cm PTC without ETE, both groups preferred Hemi, and there was no difference between the groups. When 1.5 or 2.5 cm PTC with anterior minimal ETE was suspected, the preference for Hemi by endocrinologists was significantly lower than that by surgeons (P<0.05). When anterior and posterior gross ETE were suspected, TT was preferred in both groups. When anterior gross ETE was suspected, the preference for Hemi by endocrinologists was significantly lower than that by surgeons (P<0.05). There was no difference between the groups in the posterior gross ETE. Surgeons preferred Hemi and endocrinologists preferred TT for a 1.5 cm PTC located in the isthmus. The pCND showed a similar pattern in both groups according to the size and location of the tumor and the degree of ETE. The proportion of Hemi did not differ between high-experience and low-experience endocrinologists. Also, there was no significant difference in preference for surgical extent between low-volume and high-volume surgeons. Conclusions: TT was frequently preferred in tumors with a large size or gross ETE, and pCND was frequently preferred in cases of suspected gross ETE. This study shows as the extent of thyroid surgery may differ between endocrinologists and surgeons and this could be confusing to patient and affect the patient outcomes. Therefore, multidisciplinary approach considering the extent of surgery for thyroid cancer is recommended.