Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk Factors for Local Failure Following Chemoradiation and Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Results From the EMBRACE-I Study.
Schmid, Maximilian P; Lindegaard, Jacob C; Mahantshetty, Umesh; Tanderup, Kari; Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina; Haie-Meder, Christine; Fokdal, Lars U; Sturdza, Alina; Hoskin, Peter; Segedin, Barbara; Bruheim, Kjersti; Huang, Fleur; Rai, Bhavana; Cooper, Rachel; van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta; Van Limbergen, Erik; Pieters, Bradley R; Petric, Primoz; Ramazanova, Dariga; Ristl, Robin; Kannan, Sadhana; Hawaldar, Rohini; Ecker, Stefan; Kirchheiner, Kathrin; Tan, Li Tee; Nout, Remi; Nesvacil, Nicole; de Leeuw, Astrid; Pötter, Richard; Kirisits, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Schmid MP; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
  • Lindegaard JC; Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Mahantshetty U; Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, India.
  • Tanderup K; Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Haie-Meder C; Gustave-Roussy, Department of Radiotherapy, Villejuif, France.
  • Fokdal LU; Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Sturdza A; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
  • Hoskin P; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom.
  • Segedin B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Bruheim K; The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Oslo, Norway.
  • Huang F; Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Rai B; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Chandigarh, India.
  • Cooper R; St James's University Hospital, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • van der Steen-Banasik E; Radiotherapiegroep Arnhem, Department of Radiotherapy, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
  • Van Limbergen E; UZ Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Pieters BR; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Petric P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Ramazanova D; Medical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Vienna, Austria.
  • Ristl R; Medical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kannan S; Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, India.
  • Hawaldar R; Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai and Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, India.
  • Ecker S; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kirchheiner K; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
  • Tan LT; Cambridge University Hospitals, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Nout R; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Nesvacil N; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
  • de Leeuw A; University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Pötter R; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kirisits C; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(10): 1933-1942, 2023 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36599120
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To report clinical and treatment characteristics, remission and failure patterns, and risk factors for local failure (LF) from the EMBRACE-I study. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

EMBRACE-I was a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study on magnetic resonance imaging-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MR-IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, and MR-IGABT. LF was defined as progressive or recurrent disease in the cervix, uterus, parametria, pelvic wall, or vagina. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate local tumor control (LC) and Cox proportional regression models for multivariable analysis and dose-response analysis.

RESULTS:

One thousand three hundred eighteen patients with a median follow-up of 52 months were available for this analysis. Eighty-one patients had persistent disease 3 months after end of treatment. Of those, 60 patients achieved LC at 6-9 months without further treatment, whereas 21 patients had progressive disease. In addition, 77 patients developed a local recurrence after complete remission comprising a total number of 98 LFs. LFs were located inside the MR-IGABT target volumes in 90% of patients with LF. In multivariable analysis, histology, minimal dose to 90% of high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR), maximum tumor dimension, CTVHR > 45 cm3, overall treatment time, tumor necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis, uterine corpus infiltration at diagnosis and at MR-IGABT, and mesorectal infiltration at MR-IGABT had significant impact on LF. Dose-response analysis showed that a minimal dose to 90% of 85 Gy to the CTVHR led to 95% (95% CI, 94 to 97) LC 3 years postintervention for squamous cell in comparison to 86% (95% CI, 81 to 90) for adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma histology.

CONCLUSION:

The present study demonstrates the safety and validity of the GYN GEC-ESTRO/ICRU-89 target concept and provides large-scale evidence for dose prescription and new risk factors for LF in MR-IGABT in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article