Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improved diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of readout-segmented and zoomed single-shot imaging.
Klingebiel, M; Weiland, E; Boschheidgen, M; Ullrich, T; Arsov, C; Radtke, J P; Benkert, T; Nickel, M; Strecker, R; Wittsack, H J; Albers, P; Antoch, G; Schimmöller, L.
Afiliação
  • Klingebiel M; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: maximilian.klingebiel@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Weiland E; MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: elisabeth.weiland@siemens-healthineers.com.
  • Boschheidgen M; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: matthias.boschheidgen@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Ullrich T; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: tim.ullrich@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Arsov C; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Christian.Arsov@sk-mg.de.
  • Radtke JP; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: JanPhilipp.radtke@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Benkert T; MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: benkert.thomas@siemens-healthineers.com.
  • Nickel M; MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: marcel.nickel@siemens-healthineers.com.
  • Strecker R; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Europe, Middle East & Africa, Karlheinz-Kaske-Str. 2, 91052 Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: ralph.strecker@siemens-healthineers.com.
  • Wittsack HJ; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Hans-Joerg.Wittsack@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Albers P; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Peter.Albers@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Antoch G; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Antoch@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
  • Schimmöller L; University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: Lars.Schimmoeller@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 98: 55-61, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36649807
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is the most important sequence for detection and grading prostate cancer (PCa), but it is considerably prone to artifacts. New approaches like zoomed single-shot imaging (z-EPI) with advanced image processing or multi-shot readout segmentation (rs-EPI) try to improve DWI quality. This study evaluates objective and subjective image quality (IQ) of rs-EPI and z-EPI with and without advanced processing. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Fifty-six consecutive patients (67 ± 8 years; median PSA 8.3 ng/ml) with mp-MRI performed at 3 Tesla between February and October 2019 and subsequently verified PCa by targeted plus systematic MRI/US-fusion biopsy were included in this retrospective single center cohort study. Rs-EPI and z-EPI were prospectively acquired in every patient. Signal intensities (SI) of PCa and benign tissue in ADC, b1000, and calculated high b-value images were analyzed. Endpoints were signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), PCa contrast intensity (CI), and subjective IQ on a 5-point scale evaluated by three blinded readers. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Friedman test and Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated.

RESULTS:

SNR, CNR, and PCa CI of z-EPI with and without advanced processing was superior to rs-EPI (p < 0.01), whereas no significant differences were observed between z-EPI with and without advanced processing. Subjective IQ was significantly higher for z-EPI with advanced processing compared rs-EPI for ADC, b1000, and calculated high b-values (p < 0.01). Compared to z-EPI without advanced processing, z-EPI with advanced processing was superior for ADC and calculated high b-values (p < 0.01), but no significant differences were shown for b1000 images.

CONCLUSIONS:

Z-EPI with and without advanced processing was superior to rs-EPI regarding objective imaging parameters and z-EPI with advanced processing was superior to rs-EPI regarding subjective imaging parameters for the detection of PCa.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Imagem Ecoplanar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Imagem Ecoplanar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article