Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cytology compared with Hybrid Capture 2 human papilloma virus cervical cancer screening in HIV positive and HIV negative South African women.
Snyman, Leon Cornelius; Richter, Karin Louise; Lukhwareni, Azwidowi; Dreyer, Gerrit; Botha, Matthys Hendrik; Van Der Merwe, F Haynes; Visser, Cathy; Dreyer, Greta.
Afiliação
  • Snyman LC; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa leon.snyman@up.ac.za.
  • Richter KL; Department Medical Virology, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Lukhwareni A; Department Medical Virology, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Dreyer G; Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
  • Botha MH; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Van Der Merwe FH; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Visser C; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Dreyer G; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria Faculty of Health Sciences, Pretoria, South Africa.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 33(5): 669-675, 2023 05 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36650011
OBJECTIVES: Cervical cancer is preventable and caused by persistent infection with oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV) types. HPV screening is more sensitive and is the preferred screening test. HPV screening data are mainly from developed settings, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of HPV screening in previously unscreened HIV positive and negative women. METHODS: In this cross sectional multicenter study, liquid based cytology and HPV testing were performed on women attending different clinics. Patients with positive screening tests had colposcopy and biopsy or large loop excision of the transformation zone. Some women with normal screening had colposcopy and biopsy. Data of women with histology results, and data of HIV positive and negative women were analyzed for comparison. For women without histology results, data were imputed using a statistical model. RESULTS: In 903 women with known HIV status, 683 (75.6%) had negative cytology, 202 women (22.4%) had abnormal cytology, and in 18 patients (2.0%) the results were uncertain. Mean age was 41.4 years (range 25-65). HPV tests were negative in 621 women (68.8%). In HIV positive women, 54.5% tested negative compared with 79.7% HIV negative women (p<0.0001). HPV screening had higher sensitivity (60.9%), but lower specificity (82.4%), compared with cytology (48.6% and 86.7%) for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ in all women. For detection of CIN 3+, HPV screening had higher sensitivity (70.4%) compared with cytology (62.9%), and specificity (75.5%) was lower compared with cytology at a threshold of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS+) (82.4%). CONCLUSION: HPV screening was more sensitive than cytology in HIV positive and HIV negative women, but specificity was lower. Although HPV screening should be the preferred screening test, cytology is a suitable screening test in HIV positive women in low resource settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02956031.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Displasia do Colo do Útero / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Células Escamosas Atípicas do Colo do Útero Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / Displasia do Colo do Útero / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Células Escamosas Atípicas do Colo do Útero Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article