Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic trans-anal tube placement is a safe and helpful tool for colonic decompression: final results of a standardized single-centre retrospective assessment of 125 patients.
Horn, Andreas; Sabet, Manij; Roghmann, Florian; Meves, Volker; Loss, Martin; Hochberger, Juergen; Benckert, Christoph; Berger, Andreas Wolfgang.
Afiliação
  • Horn A; Praxis für Gastroenterologie, Berlin, Germany.
  • Sabet M; Department of Gastroenterology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
  • Roghmann F; Department of General Surgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
  • Meves V; Department of Urology, Ruhr University of Bochum Faculty of Medicine, Bochum, Germany.
  • Loss M; Department of Gastroenterology, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Hochberger J; Department of General Surgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
  • Benckert C; Department of Gastroenterology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
  • Berger AW; Department of General Surgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Z Gastroenterol ; 62(2): 175-182, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669527
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Endoscopic trans-anal colonic decompression (ECD) may be requested in the case of massive colon distension, but evidence regarding success and safety issues remains scarce. The aim of this analysis is to examine the technical success, complications and clinical outcome in a large series of patients undergoing an ECD in various clinical scenarios. A standardized evaluation system was used to identify the pre-interventional risk parameters that might be helpful to guide clinical decision making.

METHODS:

In this single-centre retrospective study, the modified Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) was applied to assess technical success, complications and clinical outcome of 125 consecutive patients who underwent ECD between 2007 and 2020. PRIMARY ENDPOINT post interventional 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints periprocedural complications (CDC event IV-V) and technical success rate. All Martin criteria for standardized reporting of complications were met. Uni- and multivariable analyses for prediction of complications were carried out.

RESULTS:

The overall technical success rate was 90%. The periprocedural complication rate was low with 3%. Overall 90-day mortality was 31%. Univariable analyses showed a significant correlation between 90-day mortality and ASA≥4 (p<0.001, odds ratio [OR] 15.33), general anaesthesia (p=0.05, OR 21.42) and elevated serological infection parameters (p 0.028, OR 1.004). The pre-interventional multivariable model identified ASA ≥4 (p <0.001; OR 10.94) as the only independent risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS:

ECD is a safe, easily available, technical feasible, inexpensive and successful tool for colonic decompression in various colonic obstruction scenarios, even in critically ill patients. ASA Score ≥IV can be helpful to identify patients at risk for complications/mortality after ECD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endoscopia / Obstrução Intestinal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endoscopia / Obstrução Intestinal Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article