Differences in cognitive functions of atypical and non-atypical depression based on propensity score matching.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical and etiological heterogeneity have hindered our understanding of depression, thus driving the studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) subtypes. Atypical depression (AD) is a subtype of MDD with atypical features. Cognitive impairment is one of the factors that contribute to the suffering of patients with MDD. Therefore, this study investigated the characteristics and differences in cognitive functioning of AD and non-atypical depression (non-AD) using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). METHODS: A total of 101 patients with AD and 252 patients with non-AD were assessed with the MCCB and clinical scales. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounders between groups. After PSM, between-group differences were compared for cognitive and clinical variables. In addition, multiple linear regression analyses were performed to explore the effects of cognitive and clinical variables on the quality of life. RESULTS: The AD group scored significantly lower in attention/vigilance and social cognition in all cognitive domains than the non-AD group. Attention/vigilance and social cognition were significant positive predictors of quality of life, whereas atypical symptoms and depressive severity were significant negative predictors. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests significant differences in cognitive functions between the AD and non-AD subtypes. Atypical symptoms and impaired cognition have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Attention/vigilance and social cognition are worse in AD than non-AD, which the atypical features of patients with AD may explain. The pathological mechanisms and treatment strategies of AD should be further explored in the future to promote individualized treatment strategies.