Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of drying-rewetting cycles on the fluxes of soil greenhouse gases.
Jin, Xia; Wu, Fuzhong; Wu, Qiqian; Hedenec, Petr; Peng, Yan; Wang, Zheng; Yue, Kai.
Afiliação
  • Jin X; Key Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Eco-Geographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China.
  • Wu F; Key Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Eco-Geographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China.
  • Wu Q; Fujian Sanming Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Sanming 365002, China.
  • Hedenec P; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin'an 311300, China.
  • Peng Y; Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • Wang Z; Key Laboratory for Humid Subtropical Eco-Geographical Processes of the Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China.
  • Yue K; College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China.
Heliyon ; 9(1): e12984, 2023 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36704269
ABSTRACT
Irregular precipitation caused by climate changes has resulted in frequent events of soil drying-rewetting cycles (DWC), which can strongly affect soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling, including the fluxes of greenhouse gases (GHGs). The response of soil carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes to DWC events may differ among different ecosystem types and vary with experimental settings and soil properties, but these processes were not quantitatively assessed. Here, we evaluated the responses of soil GHG fluxes to DWC, compared with consistent moisture, as well as the associated driving factors with 424 paired observations collected from 47 publications of lab incubation experiments. Results showed that (1) DWC significantly decreased soil CO2 emissions by an average of 9.7%, but did not affect the emissions and uptakes of soil CH4 and N2O; (2) DWC effects on soil GHG emissions varied significantly among different ecosystem types, with CO2 emissions significantly decreased by 6.8 and 16.3% in croplands and grasslands soils, respectively, and CH4 and N2O emissions significantly decreased and increased in wetlands and forests soils, respectively; (3) the effects of DWC on CO2 emissions were also positively regulated by organic C and N concentrations, pH, clay concentration, and soil depth, but negatively by CN ratio and silt concentration, while DWC effects on N2O emissions were negatively controlled by CN ratio, silt concentration, and soil depth. Overall, our results showed that CO2 emissions were significantly decreased by DWC, while the fluxes of CH4 and N2O were not affected, indicating an overall decrease of GHGs in response to DWC. Our results will be useful for a better understanding of global GHG emissions under future climate change scenario.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article