Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mid-term outcomes of an alternative remodelling technique for aortic root replacement without coronary ostial mobilisation or reimplantation.
Hadjinikolaou, Leonidas; Acharya, Metesh; Dominici, Carmelo; Biancari, Fausto; Raheel, Furqan; Ahmed, Aamer; Mariscalco, Giovanni.
Afiliação
  • Hadjinikolaou L; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
  • Acharya M; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK. Metesh.Acharya@doctors.org.uk.
  • Dominici C; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Álvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
  • Biancari F; Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, P.O. Box 340, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Raheel F; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
  • Ahmed A; Department of Anaesthesia, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
  • Mariscalco G; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 18(1): 51, 2023 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36726170
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We compare the early and late outcomes of a modified aortic root remodelling (ARR) technique for aortic root replacement without mobilisation or reimplantation of the coronary ostia, with those of the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure.

METHODS:

A retrospective observational study was performed comprising 181 consecutive patients who underwent aortic root replacement with a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure (104 patients) or ARR (77 patients) between January 2013 and December 2019. Primary endpoints included hospital mortality and late survival. Secondary endpoints included incidence of post-operative complications and freedom from late re-operation.

RESULTS:

ARR procedures were performed with shorter cross-clamp times and comparable cardiopulmonary bypass times to modified Bentall-de Bono procedures. The incidence of early post-complications was comparable between groups. 30-day mortality was numerically lower with ARR than the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure. Over 7-year follow-up, 4 patients (3.8%) required repeat aortic surgery after a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure, and none after ARR. Long-term mortality after ARR and after modified Bentall-de Bono procedures was 17.1% and 22.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of reintervention on the aortic root/valve was 3.2% after a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure and 0% after ARR. When adjusted for other independent risk factors, late mortality was not influenced by the procedure performed, although competing risk adjusted for age showed that the modified Bentall-de Bono procedure was associated with an increased risk of aortic root/aortic valve re-operation.

CONCLUSIONS:

The modified ARR technique is associated with reduced myocardial ischaemia time, lower post-operative mortality and aortic re-intervention rates compared to a modified Bentall-de Bono procedure. It may be considered a safe and feasible procedure for aortic root/ascending aortic replacement offering good long-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article