Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The combination of prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring system and a genomic classifier is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy.
Benidir, Tarik; Lone, Zaeem; Nguyen, Jane K; Ward, Ryan; Hofmann, Martin; Klein, Eric A; Mian, Omar Y; Weight, Christopher J; Purysko, Andrei S.
Afiliação
  • Benidir T; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Lone Z; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Nguyen JK; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Ward R; Robert J. Tomisch Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.
  • Hofmann M; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Klein EA; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Mian OY; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Weight CJ; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • Purysko AS; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Br J Radiol ; 96(1144): 20220663, 2023 Mar 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36745009
OBJECTIVE: Pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) portends an unfavorable prognosis in prostate cancer patients. Conventional and advanced imaging remains limited in its ability to detect PLNM. We sought to evaluate the combination of a genomic classifier Decipher with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores in improving the detection of PLNM. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients whom underwent RP, Decipher analysis, and pre-operative prostate MRI. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-squareχ2 tests. Quantitative variables were assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of PLNM on final pathology. RESULTS: In total, 202 patients were included in the analysis, 23 of whom (11%) had PLNM. Patients with PLNM had higher median Decipher scores (0.73) than those without PLNM (0.61; p = 0.003). Patients with PLNM were more likely to demonstrate PI-RADS scores ≥ 4 (96%) than those without PLNM (74%; p = 0.012). Logistic regression demonstrated an interaction between Decipher score with PI-RADS score ≥4 (OR = 20.41; 95% CI, 2.10-198.74; p = 0.009) The combination demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63-0.82; p < 0.001) for predicting PLNM. CONCLUSION: The combination of elevated Decipher genomic score (≥ 0.6) and clinically significant PI-RADS score (≥ 4) is associated with PLNM at the time of RP in a modern high-risk cohort of patients with PCaprostate cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Prostate MRI and genomic testing may help identify patients with adverse pathology.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article