Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Personalized aortic pressure waveform estimation from brachial pressure waveform using an adaptive transfer function.
Du, Shuo; Yao, Yang; Sun, Guozhe; Wang, Lu; Alastruey, Jordi; Avolio, Alberto P; Xu, Lisheng.
Afiliação
  • Du S; College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, Liaoning, China.
  • Yao Y; College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, Liaoning, China.
  • Sun G; Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China.
  • Wang L; School of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, China.
  • Alastruey J; Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
  • Avolio AP; Macquarie School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Xu L; College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, Liaoning, China; Neusoft Research of Intelligent Healthcare Technology, Co. Ltd, Shenyang, 110169, Liaoning, China. Electronic address: xuls@bmie.neu.edu.cn.
Comput Biol Med ; 155: 106654, 2023 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36791548
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aortic pressure waveform (APW) provides reliable information for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. APW is often measured using a generalized transfer function (GTF) applied to the peripheral pressure waveform acquired noninvasively, to avoid the significant risks of invasive APW acquisition. However, the GTF ignores various physiological conditions, which affects the accuracy of the estimated APW. To solve this problem, this study utilized an adaptive transfer function (ATF) combined with a tube-load model to achieve personalized and accurate estimation of APW from the brachial pressure waveform (BPW). METHODS: The proposed method was validated using APWs and BPWs from 34 patients. The ATF was defined using a tube-load model in which pulse transit time and reflection coefficients were determined from, respectively, the diastolic-exponential-pressure-decay of the APW and a piece-wise constant approximation. The root-mean-square-error of overall morphology, mean absolute errors of common hemodynamic indices (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure) were used to evaluate the ATF. RESULTS: The proposed ATF performed better in estimating diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure (1.63 versus 1.94 mmHg, and 2.37 versus 3.10 mmHg, respectively, both P < 0.10), and produced similar errors in overall morphology and systolic blood pressure (3.91 versus 4.24 mmHg, and 2.83 versus 2.91 mmHg, respectively, both P > 0.10) compared to GTF. CONCLUSION: Unlike the GTF which uses fixed parameters trained on existing clinical datasets, the proposed method can achieve personalized estimation of APW. Hence, it provides accurate pulsatile hemodynamic measures for the evaluation of cardiovascular function.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Pressão Arterial Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aorta / Pressão Arterial Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article