Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient and provider perspectives to utilization of telemedicine in surgery.
Mark, John; Cooke, David T; Suri, Avni; Huynh, Timothy T; Yoon, Paul S; Humphries, Misty D.
Afiliação
  • Mark J; Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Cooke DT; Division of General Thoracic Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Suri A; Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Huynh TT; Division of General Thoracic Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Yoon PS; Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Humphries MD; Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Digit Health ; 9: 20552076231152756, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36818156
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Determine patient and provider perspectives on widespread rapid telemedicine implementation, understand the key components of a surgical telemedicine visit and identify factors that affect future telemedicine use. Summary of background data Compared to other specialties, the field of surgery heretofore has had limited adoption of telemedicine. During the COVID-19 pandemic Healthcare, including the surgical specialties, saw new widespread use of telemedicine.

Methods:

We conducted a prospective cohort study during the COVID-19 California stay-at-home and physical distancing executive orders. Utilization data were collected from clinics and compared to usage data during the same time 1 year later. All patients and providers who participated in a telemedicine visit during the study period were asked to complete a survey after each encounter and the surveys were analyzed for trends in opinions on future use by stakeholders.

Results:

Over the 10-week period, the median percentage of telemedicine visits per clinic was 33% (17%-51%) which peaked 3 weeks into implementation. One hundred and ninety-one patients (48% women) with a median age of 64 years (IQR 53-73) completed the patient survey. Patients were first-time participants in telemedicine in 41% (n = 79) of visits. Fifty-seven percent (n = 45) of first-time users preferred that future visits be in-person versus 31% of prior users (p = 0.007). The median travel time from home to the clinic was 40 min (IQR = 20-90). Patients with longer travel times were not more likely to use telemedicine in the future (61% with longer travel vs. 53% shorter, p = 0.11). From the 148 provider responses, 90% of the visits providers were able to create a definitive plan with the telemedicine visit. A physical exam was determined not to be needed in 45% of the visits. An attempt at any physical exam was not performed in 84% of routine follow-up or new-patient visits, compared to 53% of post-op visits (p = 0.001).

Conclusion:

Telemedicine is a viable ambulatory visit option for surgical specialists and their patients. During rapid telemedicine deployment, travel distance did not correlate with increased use of telemedicine, and in-person visits are still preferred. However, nearly half of all visits did not need a physical exam, which favors telemedicine use.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article