Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Virtual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy the Future for People with Dementia? An Audit of UK NHS Memory Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Fisher, Emily; Proctor, Danielle; Perkins, Luke; Felstead, Cerne; Stott, Joshua; Spector, Aimee.
Afiliação
  • Fisher E; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
  • Proctor D; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
  • Perkins L; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
  • Felstead C; Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Stott J; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
  • Spector A; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.
J Technol Behav Sci ; : 1-8, 2023 Feb 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36855467
ABSTRACT
Access to psychosocial interventions for people with dementia, such as Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST), has been restricted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some services have shifted to provision via videoconferencing, but the prevalence of this is unknown. This audit aimed to understand provision of virtual CST (vCST) within National Health Service (NHS) memory clinics throughout the UK and Channel Islands and investigate plans for ongoing CST provision. A cross-sectional survey was circulated to NHS memory clinics, which included closed and open-ended questions to generate quantitative and qualitative data. Thirty-three memory clinics responded to the survey. During the pandemic, 55% of respondents offered vCST, whereas 45% offered no CST. Of those offering vCST, 80% plan to continue with a hybrid model of separate face-to-face and vCST groups, whilst 20% intend to deliver face-to-face CST only. Reported positive aspects of vCST were participant and staff enjoyment, perceived improved digital confidence in participants, and improved accessibility for those who cannot attend face-to-face groups. Negative aspects related to digital poverty, limited digital literacy, support needed from carers, the impact of sensory impairment on engagement, and staff time commitment. Virtual CST has been a feasible alternative to face-to-face services during the pandemic but should not completely replace in-person groups. A hybrid approach would increase accessibility for all. Future research should explore efficacy of vCST and seek to understand patterns of exclusion from such digital interventions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41347-023-00306-5.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article