Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking of microbiome detection tools on RNA-seq synthetic databases according to diverse conditions.
Jurado-Rueda, Francisco; Alonso-Guirado, Lola; Perea-Cham-Blee, Tomin E; Elliott, Oliver T; Filip, Ioan; Rabadán, Raúl; Malats, Núria.
Afiliação
  • Jurado-Rueda F; Genetic & Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre and CIBERONC, Madrid 28029, Spain.
  • Alonso-Guirado L; Genetic & Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre and CIBERONC, Madrid 28029, Spain.
  • Perea-Cham-Blee TE; Program for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
  • Elliott OT; Program for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
  • Filip I; Program for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
  • Rabadán R; Program for Mathematical Genomics and Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
  • Malats N; Genetic & Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre and CIBERONC, Madrid 28029, Spain.
Bioinform Adv ; 3(1): vbad014, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36874954
Motivation: Here, we performed a benchmarking analysis of five tools for microbe sequence detection using transcriptomics data (Kraken2, MetaPhlAn2, PathSeq, DRAC and Pandora). We built a synthetic database mimicking real-world structure with tuned conditions accounting for microbe species prevalence, base calling quality and sequence length. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) parameters, as well as computational requirements, were used for tool ranking. Results: GATK PathSeq showed the highest sensitivity on average and across all scenarios considered. However, the main drawback of this tool was its slowness. Kraken2 was the fastest tool and displayed the second-best sensitivity, though with large variance depending on the species to be classified. There was no significant difference for the other three algorithms sensitivity. The sensitivity of MetaPhlAn2 and Pandora was affected by sequence number and DRAC by sequence quality and length. Results from this study support the use of Kraken2 for routine microbiome profiling based on its competitive sensitivity and runtime performance. Nonetheless, we strongly endorse to complement it by combining with MetaPhlAn2 for thorough taxonomic analyses. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/fjuradorueda/MIME/ and https://github.com/lola4/DRAC/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article