Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers.
Brooks, Joanna Veazey; Zegers, Carli; Sinclair, Christian T; Wulff-Burchfield, Elizabeth; Thimmesch, Amanda R; English, Daniel; Nelson-Brantley, Heather V.
Afiliação
  • Brooks JV; University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
  • Zegers C; University of Kansas School of Nursing, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
  • Sinclair CT; University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
  • Wulff-Burchfield E; University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
  • Thimmesch AR; University of Kansas School of Nursing, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
  • English D; University of Kansas School of Nursing, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
  • Nelson-Brantley HV; University of Kansas School of Nursing, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. hnelson-brantley@kumc.edu.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 216, 2023 Mar 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36879318
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The 21st Century Cures Act Interoperability and Information Blocking Rule was created to increase patient access to health information. This federally mandated policy has been met with praise and concern. However, little is known about patient and clinician opinions of this policy within cancer care.

METHODS:

We conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods study to understand patient and clinician reactions to the Information Blocking Rule in cancer care and what they would like policy makers to consider. Twenty-nine patients and 29 clinicians completed interviews and surveys. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Interview and survey data were analyzed separately, then linked to generate a full interpretation of the results.

RESULTS:

Overall, patients felt more positive about the policy than clinicians. Patients wanted policy makers to understand that patients are unique, and they want to individualize their preferences for receiving health information with their clinicians. Clinicians highlighted the uniqueness of cancer care, due to the highly sensitive information that is shared. Both patients and clinicians were concerned about the impact on clinician workload and stress. Both expressed an urgent need for tailoring implementation of the policy to avoid unintended harm and distress for patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings provide suggestions for optimizing the implementation of this policy in cancer care. Dissemination strategies to better inform the public about the policy and improve clinician understanding and support are recommended. Patients who have serious illness or diagnoses such as cancer and their clinicians should be included when developing and enacting policies that could have a significant impact on their well-being. Patients with cancer and their cancer care teams want the ability to tailor information release based on individual preferences and goals. Understanding how to tailor implementation of the Information Blocking Rule is essential for retaining its benefits and minimizing unintended harm for patients with cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoal Administrativo / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoal Administrativo / Neoplasias Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article