Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bayes Factors for Mixed Models: Perspective on Responses.
van Doorn, Johnny; Aust, Frederik; Haaf, Julia M; Stefan, Angelika M; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan.
Afiliação
  • van Doorn J; Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Valckeniersstraat 59, 1018 XA Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Aust F; Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Valckeniersstraat 59, 1018 XA Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Haaf JM; Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Valckeniersstraat 59, 1018 XA Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Stefan AM; Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Valckeniersstraat 59, 1018 XA Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Wagenmakers EJ; Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Valckeniersstraat 59, 1018 XA Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Comput Brain Behav ; 6(1): 127-139, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36879767
In van Doorn et al. (2021), we outlined a series of open questions concerning Bayes factors for mixed effects model comparison, with an emphasis on the impact of aggregation, the effect of measurement error, the choice of prior distributions, and the detection of interactions. Seven expert commentaries (partially) addressed these initial questions. Surprisingly perhaps, the experts disagreed (often strongly) on what is best practice-a testament to the intricacy of conducting a mixed effect model comparison. Here, we provide our perspective on these comments and highlight topics that warrant further discussion. In general, we agree with many of the commentaries that in order to take full advantage of Bayesian mixed model comparison, it is important to be aware of the specific assumptions that underlie the to-be-compared models.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article