Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Database Searching Programs for the Analysis of Single-Cell Proteomics Data.
Peng, Jiaxi; Chan, Calvin; Meng, Fei; Hu, Yechen; Chen, Lingfan; Lin, Ge; Zhang, Shen; Wheeler, Aaron R.
Afiliação
  • Peng J; Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
  • Chan C; Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
  • Meng F; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.
  • Hu Y; Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
  • Chen L; Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-XIANGYA, Changsha, Hunan 410000, China.
  • Lin G; Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H6, Canada.
  • Zhang S; Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
  • Wheeler AR; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.
J Proteome Res ; 22(4): 1298-1308, 2023 04 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36892105
ABSTRACT
Single-cell proteomics is emerging as an important subfield in the proteomics and mass spectrometry communities, with potential to reshape our understanding of cell development, cell differentiation, disease diagnosis, and the development of new therapies. Compared with significant advancements in the "hardware" that is used in single-cell proteomics, there has been little work comparing the effects of using different "software" packages to analyze single-cell proteomics datasets. To this end, seven popular proteomics programs were compared here, applying them to search three single-cell proteomics datasets generated by three different platforms. The results suggest that MSGF+, MSFragger, and Proteome Discoverer are generally more efficient in maximizing protein identifications, that MaxQuant is better suited for the identification of low-abundance proteins, that MSFragger is superior in elucidating peptide modifications, and that Mascot and X!Tandem are better for analyzing long peptides. Furthermore, an experiment with different loading amounts was carried out to investigate changes in identification results and to explore areas in which single-cell proteomics data analysis may be improved in the future. We propose that this comparative study may provide insight for experts and beginners alike operating in the emerging subfield of single-cell proteomics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteômica / Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteômica / Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article